Garnier S, Bertrand Ph, Chapiron C, Asquier E, Rouleau Ph, Brunereau L
Service de radiologie adultes, groupement d'imagerie, CHU Bretonneau, 2 boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours cedex 1.
J Radiol. 2004 Jun;85(6 Pt 1):747-53. doi: 10.1016/s0221-0363(04)97677-9.
to estimate from phantom measurements the radiation dose and the accuracy of helical ct pelvimetry.
Eight helical CT acquisitions using different tube current (100, 50, 25 or 10mAs) and pitch factor (1.125 or 1.375) settings but identical collimation (2mm) and kilovoltage (120 kVp) were evaluated using a four-channel MDCT scanner and compared with conventional CT pelvimetry including a single scout and two transverse images. A plexiglas phantom combined with an ionization chamber was used to calculate the CTDIw and DLP for each acquisition. Then, an ex vivo phantom of bony pelvis was used to evaluate the accuracy of helical acquisitions for the measurement of pelvic diameters (i.e. the antero-posterior inlet, the transverse inlet and the interspinous distance). Reconstructions of helical acquisitions were performed using 2D MPR, 3D MIP and 3D SSD algorithms.
CTDIw and DLP of conventional pelvimetry were 26 mGy and 42 mGy.cm respectively. The radiation dose of helical acquisitions decreased linearly with tube current (CTDIw: from 13 to 1.3 mGy, DLP: from 218.3 to 18.7 mGy.cm). Compared to conventional CT, the dose was nearly similar at 25 mAs and reduced at 10 mAs. Helical acquisitions provided accurate measurements of pelvic diameters with a pitch of 1.125 and a 2D MPR algorithm to evaluate the AP inlet and a 3D MIP algorithm to evaluate the transverse inlet and the interspinous distance. Variations of tube current did not influence the accuracy of pelvic diameter measurement.
Our results suggest that accurate low-dose helical CT pelvimetry using 10-25 mAs and a pitch factor of 1.125 combined with 2D MPR and 3D MIP reconstructions is possible.
通过体模测量估计螺旋CT骨盆测量的辐射剂量及准确性。
使用四通道MDCT扫描仪对8次螺旋CT采集进行评估,这些采集采用不同的管电流(100、50、25或10 mAs)和螺距因子(1.125或1.375)设置,但准直(2 mm)和千伏(120 kVp)相同,并与包括单次定位像和两张横断图像的传统CT骨盆测量进行比较。使用一个有机玻璃体模结合电离室来计算每次采集的容积CT剂量指数(CTDIw)和剂量长度乘积(DLP)。然后,使用一个离体骨盆骨体模来评估螺旋采集测量骨盆直径(即前后径入口、横径入口和棘间距离)的准确性。螺旋采集的重建使用二维多平面重组(2D MPR)、三维最大密度投影(3D MIP)和三维表面遮盖显示(3D SSD)算法。
传统骨盆测量的CTDIw和DLP分别为26 mGy和42 mGy·cm。螺旋采集的辐射剂量随管电流呈线性下降(CTDIw:从13 mGy降至1.3 mGy,DLP:从218.3 mGy·cm降至18.7 mGy·cm)。与传统CT相比,25 mAs时剂量几乎相似,10 mAs时剂量降低。螺旋采集在螺距为1.125、使用2D MPR算法评估前后径入口以及使用3D MIP算法评估横径入口和棘间距离时,能提供准确的骨盆直径测量。管电流的变化不影响骨盆直径测量的准确性。
我们的结果表明,使用10 - 25 mAs、螺距因子为1.125并结合2D MPR和3D MIP重建进行准确的低剂量螺旋CT骨盆测量是可行的。