van den Broek Walter W, Birkenhäger Tom K, Mulder Paul G H, Bruijn Jan A, Moleman Peter
Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Oct;175(4):481-6. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1853-3.
To compare the efficacy of imipramine and fluvoxamine in inpatients from two centers suffering from a depressive disorder according to DSM IV criteria.
The study included 141 patients with a depressive disorder according to DSM IV criteria. After a drug-free and placebo run-in period of 1 week, patients were randomized to imipramine or fluvoxamine; doses of both drugs were adjusted to a predefined target blood level. Efficacy was evaluated 4 weeks after attaining predefined adequate plasma level.
The mean age of the study group (47 males, 94 females) was 51.8 (range 19-65) years. Of these 141 patients, 56 had episode duration longer than 1 year, 48 had mood congruent psychotic features, and 138 patients received medication. Seven patients did not complete the medication trial. The total number of patients using concurrent medication was 12/138 (8.6%). On the primary outcome criteria patients on imipramine improved significantly better on the change of illness severity score of the CGI (chi2 exact trend test=4.089, df=1, P=-0.048). There was no significant difference in 50% or more reduction on the HRSD, the other primary outcome criterion. On the secondary outcome criteria the mean reduction of the HRSD scores was significantly larger in the imipramine group than in the fluvoxamine group (mean difference=3.1, standard error (SE)=1.4, t=2.15, df=136, P=0.033). There was no significant difference in the number of patients with an HRSD < or =7 at the final evaluation.
In depressed inpatients imipramine is more efficacious than fluvoxamine. Both drugs were well tolerated by all patients.
根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)标准,比较丙咪嗪和氟伏沙明对两个中心患有抑郁症的住院患者的疗效。
该研究纳入了141例符合DSM-IV标准的抑郁症患者。经过1周的药物洗脱和安慰剂导入期后,患者被随机分为丙咪嗪组或氟伏沙明组;两种药物的剂量均调整至预先设定的目标血药浓度。在达到预先设定的足够血浆浓度4周后评估疗效。
研究组(47例男性,94例女性)的平均年龄为51.8岁(范围19 - 65岁)。在这141例患者中,56例发作持续时间超过1年,48例有心境一致的精神病性特征,138例患者接受了药物治疗。7例患者未完成药物试验。同时使用其他药物的患者总数为12/138(8.6%)。在主要结局标准方面,丙咪嗪组患者在临床总体印象量表(CGI)疾病严重程度评分变化上改善明显更好(卡方精确趋势检验=4.089,自由度=1,P = -0.048)。在另一个主要结局标准汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HRSD)评分降低50%或更多方面,两组无显著差异。在次要结局标准方面,丙咪嗪组HRSD评分的平均降低幅度显著大于氟伏沙明组(平均差异=3.1,标准误(SE)=1.4,t = 2.15,自由度=136,P = 0.033)。在最终评估时,HRSD≤7的患者数量两组无显著差异。
在抑郁症住院患者中,丙咪嗪比氟伏沙明更有效。所有患者对两种药物的耐受性均良好。