Weber M, Schildmann J, Schüz J, Herrmann E, Vollmann J, Rittner C
III. Medizinische Klinik und Institut für Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik, Universitätskliniken Mainz, und Institut für Rechtsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2004 Jul 9;129(28-29):1556-60. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-828989.
Physicians are often confronted with ethical and legal questions at the end of life. In this study we asked medical students at the universities of Mainz and Berlin (Charité) about the "Guidelines on Physicians' Aid to the Dying" issued by the German Medical Association: their moral attitude and legal knowledge regarding the limitation of medical procedures at the end of life and their judgement about the quality of medical education on these topics.
569 medical students in their 1. and 4. clinical semester as well as the final year of their studies in Mainz and students in their 5. year of studies in Berlin received a questionnaire containing 14 items relating to ethical and legal questions at the end of life.
308 (54.1%) completed the questionnaire. 7.8% knew the contents of the "Guidelines on Physicians' Aid to the Dying". Between 10% (use of catecholamines) and 62% (parenteral feeding) viewed withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining measures from dying patients as illegal. 39-72% held the view that measures of nutrition and hydration were part of the indispensable basic medical care for every patient. 12-26% were unsure with respect to their moral views about withholding and withdrawal of therapy. 82% felt insufficiently prepared for dealing with ethical questions at the end of life.
Only a minority of medical students was informed about ethical principles and legal regulations regarding end-of-life decisions. Teaching of ethical and legal knowledge and integration of these issues into clinical problem solving should be mandatory.
医生在临终阶段常常面临伦理和法律问题。在本研究中,我们询问了美因茨大学和柏林(夏里特)大学的医学生关于德国医学协会发布的“医生协助临终患者指南”的情况:他们对临终时医疗程序限制的道德态度和法律知识,以及他们对这些主题医学教育质量的判断。
美因茨大学临床第一学期、第四学期以及最后一年的569名医学生,以及柏林大学第五年的学生收到了一份包含14项与临终伦理和法律问题相关条目的问卷。
308名(54.1%)学生完成了问卷。7.8%的人了解“医生协助临终患者指南”的内容。10%(使用儿茶酚胺)至62%(胃肠外营养)的人认为对临终患者停止或撤销维持生命的措施是违法的。39% - 72%的人认为营养和水化措施是每位患者不可或缺的基本医疗护理的一部分。12% - 26%的人对停止和撤销治疗的道德观点不确定。82%的人觉得在处理临终伦理问题方面准备不足。
只有少数医学生了解关于临终决策的伦理原则和法律法规。伦理和法律知识的教学以及将这些问题融入临床问题解决中应成为必修课。