Rubaltelli Leopoldo, Khadivi Yeganeh, Tregnaghi Alberto, Stramare Roberto, Ferro Federica, Borsato Simonetta, Fiocco Ugo, Adami Fausto, Rossi Carlo Riccardo
Department of Medical Diagnostic Sciences and Special Therapies, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
J Ultrasound Med. 2004 Jun;23(6):829-36. doi: 10.7863/jum.2004.23.6.829.
To evaluate the contribution of continuous mode contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasonography (CE-HUS) with a second-generation contrast agent to the characterization of superficial lymphadenopathies with respect to conventional ultrasonographic techniques (B-mode and power Doppler).
Fifty-six lymph nodes from 45 patients were studied both by conventional techniques and by CE-HUS. The dimensions, intranodal architecture, margins, and location of vessels were evaluated. Subsequently, all the lymph nodes were examined by CE-HUS, and enhancement of echogenicity was evaluated. The diagnoses obtained by means of fine-needle aspiration cytologic examination, surgical biopsy, or both were compared with those obtained by ultrasonography.
Of the lymph nodes examined, 30 were benign and 26 were malignant (18 metastases and 8 non-Hodgkin lymphomas). The study using CE-HUS showed intense homogeneous enhancement in 28 of 30 reactive lymph nodes; perfusion defects in 17, of which 15 were neoplastic and 2 were inflammatory; intense but inhomogeneous speckled enhancement in the early arterial phase in 5 cases of lymphoma; and, last, scarce or absent intranodal enhancement in 4 metastases. The specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of conventional techniques in differentiation between benign and malignant lymph nodes were 76%, 80%, and 78% versus 93%, 92%, and 92.8% for CE-HUS. The increase in correct diagnoses was significant (P = .05) when conventional ultrasonography was tested against CE-HUS.
Superficial lymph nodes can be characterized as being neoplastic or benign with a high degree of diagnostic accuracy on the basis of the perfusion characteristics evaluated by CE-HUS. This technique has been shown to afford a higher degree of accuracy than currently obtainable by any other ultrasonographic technique.
评估使用第二代造影剂的连续模式对比增强谐波超声检查(CE-HUS)相对于传统超声检查技术(B 模式和功率多普勒)在浅表淋巴结病变特征描述方面的作用。
对 45 例患者的 56 个淋巴结进行了传统技术和 CE-HUS 检查。评估了淋巴结的大小、内部结构、边界及血管位置。随后,对所有淋巴结进行 CE-HUS 检查,并评估回声增强情况。将细针穿刺细胞学检查、手术活检或两者相结合所获得的诊断结果与超声检查结果进行比较。
在所检查的淋巴结中,30 个为良性,26 个为恶性(18 个转移瘤和 8 个非霍奇金淋巴瘤)。使用 CE-HUS 的研究显示,30 个反应性淋巴结中有 28 个呈现强烈均匀增强;17 个出现灌注缺损,其中 15 个为肿瘤性,2 个为炎性;5 例淋巴瘤在动脉早期呈现强烈但不均匀的斑点状增强;最后,4 个转移瘤内增强稀少或无增强。传统技术在鉴别良性和恶性淋巴结方面的特异性、敏感性和准确性分别为 76%、80%和 78%,而 CE-HUS 分别为 93%、92%和 92.8%。当将传统超声检查与 CE-HUS 进行对比时,正确诊断的增加具有显著性(P = 0.05)。
根据 CE-HUS 评估的灌注特征,浅表淋巴结可被高度准确地判定为肿瘤性或良性。已证明该技术比目前任何其他超声检查技术具有更高的准确性。