Onyeaso C O, Arowojolu M O, Okoje V N
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine/University College Hospital, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
Dent Traumatol. 2004 Aug;20(4):187-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2004.00245.x.
The objective of this study was to assess the knowledge and attitudes of Nigerian dentists towards mouthguard protection. A pre-tested 15-item, one-page questionnaire was distributed to 185 dentists practising in different parts of the country with government hospitals or private establishments, by 'hand-delivery' system. Filled and returned forms were 170 (response rate of 92%). The period of the survey was between April and August 2003. Dental graduates from the different dental schools in the country responded to this survey. About 49% of the respondents indicated having only classroom lectures on mouthguards during their undergraduate trainings, 11% said they had some laboratory sessions in addition while no form of education on mouthguards was received by 40%. About 82% had never recommended mouthguard protection for athletic patients, and the major reason was no formal training in the subject. Only 58.5% were familiar with the different types of mouthguards, 75.9% would not be able to supervise or fabricate mouthguards and 50.6% would prefer custom-made mouthguard for their athletic patients. About 84% felt the current training on mouthguards in Nigerian dental schools is inadequate. Over 98% agreed that mouthguard usage in contact sports should be encouraged with the involvement of the dentists. The knowledge and attitudes of the respondents towards mouthguard protection did not vary significantly across years of postqualification from dental schools as well as the professional status of the dentists (P > 0.05). Although Nigerian dentists support mouthguard protection in contact sports and want to be involved in the provision of mouthguards for athletes, their knowledge of the protective device is inadequate. There is need for attention to be given to this subject in the undergraduate curricula of our dental schools.
本研究的目的是评估尼日利亚牙医对护齿器保护的知识和态度。通过“人工投递”系统,向在该国不同地区的政府医院或私人机构执业的185名牙医发放了一份经过预测试的、包含15个条目的单页问卷。回收的有效问卷有170份(回复率为92%)。调查时间为2003年4月至8月。该国不同牙科学院的牙科毕业生参与了此次调查。约49%的受访者表示在本科培训期间仅接受过关于护齿器的课堂讲座,11%称除课堂讲座外还进行了一些实验室课程学习,而40%未接受过任何形式的护齿器相关教育。约82%的人从未为运动患者推荐过护齿器保护,主要原因是该学科缺乏正规培训。只有58.5%的人熟悉不同类型的护齿器,75.9%的人无法监督或制作护齿器,50.6%的人更倾向于为运动患者定制护齿器。约84%的人认为尼日利亚牙科学院目前关于护齿器的培训不足。超过98%的人同意应鼓励在接触性运动中使用护齿器,并让牙医参与其中。受访者对护齿器保护的知识和态度在毕业后的年份以及牙医的专业地位方面没有显著差异(P>0.05)。尽管尼日利亚牙医支持在接触性运动中使用护齿器,并希望参与为运动员提供护齿器,但他们对这种保护装置的了解不足。我国牙科学院的本科课程需要关注这一主题。