Astrand Per, Engquist Bo, Dahlgren Simon, Gröndahl Kerstin, Engquist Eva, Feldmann Hartmut
Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Aug;15(4):413-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01028.x.
This paper describes the 5-year results of a comparative study between Astra Tech and Brånemark system implants. The aim was to compare the systems primarily with regard to bone level changes, and also with regard to other variables of interest. Sixty-six patients with edentulous jaws were included in the study. Randomisation schedules were used to allocate the patients to the two implant systems. 184 Astra Tech implants with a titanium-blasted surface and 187 Brånemark implants with a turned surface were used. The implants were inserted with a two-stage technique and the insertion followed the routines for the respective implant system. All patients were provided with full-arch fixed bridges. All patients were followed up with clinical and radiographic examinations from fixture insertion to the 5-year follow-up. The total mean bone level change in the upper jaw between fixture insertion and the 5-year examination was -1.74+/-0.45 mm at the Astra implants and -1.98+/-0.21 at the Brånemark implants. The corresponding values for the lower jaw were -1.06+/-0.19 for Astra and -1.38+/-0.17 for Brånemark. The major postoperative changes of the marginal bone level took place between fixture insertion and baseline. During this period, there was also a different pattern of bone remodelling between the implant systems. Between baseline (prosthesis connection) and the 5-year examination, the marginal bone level changes were small, with no difference between the implant systems. The implant stability was examined with the supraconstructions removed. At the 5-year examination, the survival rate for Astra Tech implants was 98.4% and for the Brånemark implants it was 94.6%. The difference was not statistically significant.
本文描述了一项关于Astra Tech种植体系统和Brånemark种植体系统的对比研究的5年结果。目的主要是比较这两种系统在骨水平变化方面的情况,同时也比较其他相关变量。66例无牙颌患者纳入该研究。采用随机分组方案将患者分配至两种种植体系统。使用了184颗表面经过钛喷砂处理的Astra Tech种植体和187颗表面经过车削处理的Brånemark种植体。种植体采用两阶段技术植入,植入过程遵循各自种植体系统的常规操作。所有患者均安装全牙弓固定桥。从种植体植入到5年随访期间,所有患者均接受临床和影像学检查。在上颌,从种植体植入到5年检查时,Astra种植体的总平均骨水平变化为-1.74±0.45mm,Brånemark种植体为-1.98±0.21mm。在下颌,相应的数值Astra为-1.06±0.19,Brånemark为-1.38±0.17。边缘骨水平的主要术后变化发生在种植体植入到基线期之间。在此期间,两种种植体系统之间的骨重塑模式也有所不同。从基线期(义齿连接)到5年检查时,边缘骨水平变化较小,两种种植体系统之间无差异。在拆除上部结构的情况下检查种植体稳定性。在5年检查时,Astra Tech种植体的存留率为98.4%,Brånemark种植体为94.6%。差异无统计学意义。