Harris Susan J, Farren Malcolm D, Janssen Patricia A, Klein Michael C, Lee Shoo K
Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004 Jul;26(7):633-40. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30610-7.
(1) To compare perinatal outcomes and costs of care among women giving birth in a single room maternity care (SRMC) setting versus a traditional delivery suite or postpartum setting; and (2) to report on physicians' responses to the SRMC environment.
Among women who were determined to be at "low risk" for intrapartum complications through the use of a triage tool, the outcomes of those receiving care in the new SRMC unit were compared to the outcomes of those cared for in the traditional delivery suite and postpartum modules. Total costs of the entire maternity service before and after implementation of SRMC were also compared. Physicians were surveyed about the adequacy of the physical environment.
Rates of intrapartum interventions and adverse outcomes were similar in both groups, with the exception of less frequent electronic fetal monitoring in the SRMC setting. Caesarean section rates were lower than expected in both groups. Length of stay was significantly shorter in the SRMC group (55.1 +/- 26.5 days vs. 61.0 +/- 24.3 days; <.001). Staff positions in the hospital were reduced from 206 to 193.7. Direct costs for women of similar acuity (resource intensity weightings) were reduced by 24% (1809 dollars vs. 2377 dollars). The proportion of physicians preferring SRMC to the traditional setting increased from 45.8% at 6 months to 78.7% at 12 months after implementation of the SRMC model (P =.003).
SRMC is a model of obstetric care for women at low risk for intrapartum complications, offering cost savings without affecting perinatal outcomes, and is well accepted by physicians.
(1)比较在单人房间产科护理(SRMC)环境中分娩的女性与在传统分娩套房或产后环境中分娩的女性的围产期结局和护理成本;(2)报告医生对SRMC环境的反应。
通过使用分诊工具确定为产时并发症“低风险”的女性中,将在新的SRMC单元接受护理的女性的结局与在传统分娩套房和产后模块中接受护理的女性的结局进行比较。还比较了SRMC实施前后整个产科服务的总成本。对医生进行了关于物理环境充足性的调查。
两组的产时干预率和不良结局相似,但SRMC环境中电子胎儿监护的频率较低。两组的剖宫产率均低于预期。SRMC组的住院时间明显更短(55.1±26.5天对61.0±24.3天;<.001)。医院的工作人员岗位从206个减少到193.7个。相似 acuity(资源强度权重)的女性的直接成本降低了24%(1809美元对2377美元)。实施SRMC模式后,更喜欢SRMC而非传统环境的医生比例从6个月时的45.8%增加到12个月时的78.7%(P =.003)。
SRMC是一种针对产时并发症低风险女性的产科护理模式,在不影响围产期结局的情况下节省了成本,并且受到医生的广泛接受。