Vaccaro Olga, Eberly Lynn E, Neaton James D, Yang Lingfeng, Riccardi Gabriele, Stamler Jeremiah
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Federico II University of Naples.
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jul 12;164(13):1438-43. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.13.1438.
The magnitude of coronary mortality risk associated with diabetes or prior myocardial infarction (MI) is debatable. Modulating effects of age, risk factors, and duration of follow-up may explain discrepancies in previous research. Associations with noncardiovascular mortality are little explored.
To compare mortality patterns in men with a history of diabetes or MI and to assess modulating effects on mortality of age, cardiovascular risk factors, and follow-up duration.
We compared the 25-year mortality of 4809 men with diabetes only and 4625 men with MI only (all men aged 35-57 years).
The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality for those with MI only vs those with diabetes only was 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.03; P =.32). The pattern of deaths was different: higher coronary mortality (HR = 1.37; P<.001) and lower mortality from noncardiovascular causes (HR = 0.66; P<.001) in those with MI only compared with those with diabetes only. This finding prevailed across all ages and levels of cardiovascular risk factors. Hazard ratios for coronary mortality significantly declined over follow-up (2.7, 1.7, 1.2, 1.1, and 1.0 for < or =5, 6-10, 11-15, 16-20, and >20 years of follow-up, respectively), whereas HRs for noncardiovascular mortality remained relatively constant.
Overall, diabetes and MI were similarly strong predictors of total mortality. Higher mortality from noncardiovascular causes was observed in those with diabetes only, whereas prior MI was more strongly predictive of coronary mortality than diabetes at any age and level of cardiovascular risk factors. The difference in coronary mortality between the 2 groups was most evident in the first 10 years of follow-up.
与糖尿病或既往心肌梗死(MI)相关的冠状动脉死亡风险程度存在争议。年龄、风险因素及随访时间的调节作用可能解释了既往研究中的差异。与非心血管疾病死亡率的关联则鲜有探讨。
比较有糖尿病或心肌梗死病史男性的死亡模式,并评估年龄、心血管风险因素及随访时间对死亡率的调节作用。
我们比较了4809例仅患有糖尿病的男性和4625例仅患有心肌梗死的男性(所有男性年龄在35至57岁之间)的25年死亡率。
仅患有心肌梗死的患者与仅患有糖尿病的患者相比,全因死亡率的校正风险比(HR)为0.97(95%置信区间为0.92 - 1.03;P = 0.32)。死亡模式不同:仅患有心肌梗死的患者与仅患有糖尿病的患者相比,冠状动脉死亡率更高(HR = 1.37;P < 0.001),非心血管疾病原因导致的死亡率更低(HR = 0.66;P < 0.001)。这一发现适用于所有年龄和心血管风险因素水平。冠状动脉死亡率的风险比在随访期间显著下降(随访时间≤5年、6 - 10年、11 - 15年、16 - 20年和>20年时分别为2.7、1.7、1.2、1.1和1.0),而非心血管疾病死亡率的风险比保持相对稳定。
总体而言,糖尿病和心肌梗死是全因死亡率同样有力的预测因素。仅患有糖尿病的患者非心血管疾病导致的死亡率更高,而在任何年龄和心血管风险因素水平下,既往心肌梗死比糖尿病更能强烈预测冠状动脉死亡率。两组之间冠状动脉死亡率的差异在随访的前10年最为明显。