van der Burg Marjoke, Bouwen Anne, Stessens Johan, Ylieff Michel, Fontaine Ovide, de Lepeleire Jan, Buntinx Frank
Qualidem, Department of General Practice, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;19(7):685-9. doi: 10.1002/gps.1143.
To compare the dementia screening performance of two scoring systems of the clock drawing test.
A sample of 1199 elderly subjects was administered the clock drawing test as part of a study on aging and dementia. The clock drawings were scored using published criteria for the two scoring systems that were compared. Additionally, a selection of 103 drawings was scored by three different raters to evaluate inter-rater agreement within each of the two methods. For a selection of 473 drawings the final diagnosis on the presence or absence of dementia was known. For these drawings accuracy for the detection of dementia was compared between the two methods.
The four-item scoring system (Kappa 0.76; sensitivity 0.97; specificity 0.32; PPV 0.53; NPV 0.93) was found to be a little more reliable and as accurate as the six-item scoring system (Kappa 0.67; sensitivity 0.96; specificity 0.42; PPV 0.56; NPV 0.94).
Since both scoring systems showed largely similar results, primary care physicians and other health care providers should be encouraged to use the four-item scoring checklist as it is easier and requires less time than the more elaborate checklist of the six-item system.
比较时钟画测试两种评分系统在痴呆筛查方面的表现。
作为一项关于衰老与痴呆研究的一部分,对1199名老年受试者进行了时钟画测试。根据已发表的标准对两种评分系统的时钟画进行评分并比较。此外,由三名不同的评分者对103幅画作进行评分,以评估两种方法各自的评分者间一致性。对于473幅画作,已知其关于是否患有痴呆的最终诊断结果。比较这两种方法在这些画作上检测痴呆的准确性。
发现四项评分系统(卡帕值0.76;灵敏度0.97;特异度0.32;阳性预测值0.53;阴性预测值0.93)比六项评分系统(卡帕值0.67;灵敏度0.96;特异度0.42;阳性预测值0.56;阴性预测值0.94)稍可靠且准确性相当。
由于两种评分系统的结果大致相似,应鼓励初级保健医生和其他医疗服务提供者使用四项评分检查表,因为它比更复杂的六项系统检查表更简便且耗时更少。