Suppr超能文献

[记忆障碍筛查量表(MIS)的西班牙语版本:常模数据与判别效度]

[Spanish version of the Memory Impairment Screen (MIS): normative data and discriminant validity].

作者信息

Böhm P, Peña-Casanova J, Gramunt N, Manero R M, Terrón C, Quiñones-Ubeda S

机构信息

Sección de Neurología de la Conducta y Demencias, Institut Municipal d'Assistència Sanitària (IMAS), Hospital del Mar, Barcelona.

出版信息

Neurologia. 2005 Oct;20(8):402-11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Present data on discriminative and normative validity for the Memory Impairment Screen (MIS) in a cross-sectional validation study within a dementia-clinic setting using a Spanish adaptation of the MIS. Assess its usefulness as a screening instrument for memory problems related to primary dementing disorders, foremost Alzheimer's Disease (AD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

403 subjects, including 188 demented subjects according to DSM-IV criteria (119 of which presented AD according to NINCDS-ADRDA criteria) and 215 controls, over 50 years. The MIS, a four word memory test using a specific encoding technique and scoring on a 0-8 range, formed part of the neuropsychological workup, but it was not used for diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) were calculated for the MIS against the gold-standard of clinical diagnosis by two blinded clinicians. ROC curves for the discrimination between demented subjects and controls, and AD subjects and controls were plotted.

RESULTS

Control subjects were significantly younger and better educated than the demented samples (p<0.001). No sex differences could be established. ROC curves demonstrated excellent discriminative validity of the MIS 402 for dementia on a whole (0.944) and even better for AD (0.978). The MIS presents satisfying results regarding sensitivity and specificity as well as PPV for different base rates, but the most effective cut-off score lies at < or = 4 points. For all demented subjects this cut-off represents a sensitivity of 0.74 and specificity of 0.96; for AD results are 0.86 and 0.96. More importantly, PPV values are above 0.65 for assumed base rates of 10% and more. Negative predictive values are almost 1 for all assumed base rates.

CONCLUSION

The Spanish version of the MIS reliably differentiates between normal and demented subjects. Nevertheless one has to consider the setting of the study when interpreting the results. The use of the S-MIS seems to be justified as first level dementia screening tool.

摘要

目的

在痴呆症诊所环境中开展一项横断面验证研究,使用西班牙语改编版的记忆损害筛查量表(MIS),呈现其区分效度和效标效度的数据。评估其作为与原发性痴呆症(主要是阿尔茨海默病(AD))相关的记忆问题筛查工具的有用性。

材料与方法

403名受试者,包括根据DSM-IV标准诊断的188名痴呆患者(其中119名根据NINCDS-ADRDA标准诊断为AD)和215名50岁以上的对照者。MIS是一项使用特定编码技术的四字记忆测试,评分范围为0至8分,是神经心理学检查的一部分,但不用于诊断。由两名不知情的临床医生针对临床诊断的金标准计算MIS的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。绘制痴呆患者与对照者以及AD患者与对照者之间鉴别的ROC曲线。

结果

对照者比痴呆样本显著更年轻且受教育程度更高(p<0.001)。未发现性别差异。ROC曲线表明,MIS 402对痴呆总体具有出色的区分效度(0.944),对AD的区分效度甚至更好(0.978)。MIS在敏感性、特异性以及不同基础率的PPV方面均呈现出令人满意的结果,但最有效的临界值为≤4分。对于所有痴呆患者,该临界值的敏感性为0.74,特异性为0.96;对于AD,结果分别为0.86和0.96。更重要的是,对于假定基础率为10%及以上的情况,PPV值高于0.65。对于所有假定基础率,阴性预测值几乎为1。

结论

西班牙语版的MIS能够可靠地区分正常受试者和痴呆受试者。然而,在解释结果时必须考虑研究背景。S-MIS作为一级痴呆筛查工具的使用似乎是合理的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验