Walling Dennis M, Andritsos Leslie A, Etienne Wiguins, Payne Deborah A, Aronson Judith F, Flaitz Catherine M, Nichols C Mark
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, 77555-0435, USA.
J Med Virol. 2004 Sep;74(1):94-101. doi: 10.1002/jmv.20151.
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disease may be polyclonal, oligoclonal, or monoclonal. The degree of tumor clonality reflects the disease pathogenesis and may have implications for disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. In this study, specimens of EBV-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disease obtained from immunocompromised hosts were analyzed for molecular markers of cellular and virologic clonality and virologic identity. Each tumor specimen was assessed for immunoglobulin gene JH region rearrangement, the structure of the EBV genome termini, and the EBV genotype(s) present using a new EBV genotyping assay based upon LMP-1 gene sequence variation. The results of the JH rearrangement and EBV termini assays were generally concordant in their assessment of tumor specimen clonality, and both assays contributed to establishing clonal identity between different tumor specimens. The EBV genotyping assay did not significantly contribute to the assessment of tumor clonality but did established clear virologic identity between different tumor specimens obtained from the same individual. In one individual, these three assays together characterized a multi-focal, monoclonal tumor that may have arisen through clonal selection after sequential infections with two different EBV genotypes. In summary, the JH rearrangement and EBV termini assays each provided different but complementary information on tumor clonality, while the EBV genotyping assay proved most useful for establishing virologic identity among tumors. Utilization of these three assays together may provide new insight into the pathogenesis of EBV-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disease.
爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV)相关的B细胞淋巴增殖性疾病可能是多克隆性、寡克隆性或单克隆性的。肿瘤克隆性程度反映了疾病的发病机制,可能对疾病的诊断、预后和治疗有影响。在本研究中,对从免疫功能低下宿主获取的EBV相关B细胞淋巴增殖性疾病标本进行了细胞和病毒克隆性以及病毒特性的分子标志物分析。使用基于LMP-1基因序列变异的新型EBV基因分型检测方法,对每个肿瘤标本的免疫球蛋白基因JH区域重排、EBV基因组末端结构以及存在的EBV基因型进行评估。JH重排和EBV末端检测结果在评估肿瘤标本克隆性方面总体一致,两种检测方法都有助于确定不同肿瘤标本之间的克隆特性。EBV基因分型检测对肿瘤克隆性评估没有显著贡献,但确实在来自同一个体的不同肿瘤标本之间确定了明确的病毒特性。在一名个体中,这三种检测方法共同鉴定出一个多灶性单克隆肿瘤,该肿瘤可能是在先后感染两种不同EBV基因型后通过克隆选择产生的。总之,JH重排和EBV末端检测各自提供了关于肿瘤克隆性的不同但互补的信息,而EBV基因分型检测在确定肿瘤之间的病毒特性方面最为有用。同时使用这三种检测方法可能为EBV相关B细胞淋巴增殖性疾病的发病机制提供新的见解。