Ashaye A O
Department of Ophthalmology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Afr J Med Med Sci. 2003 Dec;32(4):413-6.
The routine use of gonioscopy for the evaluation of drainage angles in developing countries is not always done because of the busy clinics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of 2 tests: Peripheral Anterior Chamber Depth (PACD) measurement and Central Anterior Chamber Depth (CACD) measurement in detecting occludable angles and primary angle closure within subjects with primary glaucoma and control subjects. Two hundred and forty subjects with primary glaucoma and a control group of 250 subjects were studied. PACD was measured with the Van Herrick's method while CACD was measured by the technique described by Lowe. The findings were compared to the gonioscopic appearance of the drainage angles in the two groups. PACD gradings 0 to 2 correctly identified 28 out of 36 eyes (77.8%) of subjects with PACG who had gonioscopically closed angles. The test identified correctly 168 out of 204 eyes (82.4%) with gonioscopically open angles among subjects with primary glaucoma. Among subjects with no glaucoma, PACD gradings 0 to 2 correctly identified 12 out of the 14 eyes with gonioscopically occludable angles, while the test identified 238 eyes without occludable angles, gonioscopy identified 236 out of 250 of such eyes. A CACD less than 2.5 mm was present in only 21 eyes of 36 eyes with occludable angles by gonioscopy among those with PACG. In the other 15 eyes with occludable angles, CACD was more than 2.5 mm. PACD performed well in detecting occluded angles in this study, CACD was useful but less so than PACD in established cases of PACG. Subjects with PACG but whose CACD was 2.5 mm or more may have plateau iris. PACD and CACD are both useful methods in identifying occludable angles in eyes of Nigerian subjects studied.
在发展中国家,由于诊所繁忙,并非总是对房角进行常规的前房角镜检查以评估房角引流情况。本研究的目的是评估两项检查的性能:周边前房深度(PACD)测量和中央前房深度(CACD)测量,以检测原发性青光眼患者和对照受试者中的可闭合房角和原发性房角关闭情况。对240名原发性青光眼患者和250名对照受试者进行了研究。PACD采用范·赫里克法测量,而CACD采用洛描述的技术测量。将研究结果与两组房角镜下房角引流情况进行比较。PACD分级0至2正确识别出36眼中28眼(77.8%)房角镜检查显示房角关闭的原发性房角关闭性青光眼(PACG)患者。该检查正确识别出原发性青光眼患者中204眼中168眼(82.4%)房角镜检查显示房角开放的患者。在无青光眼的受试者中,PACD分级0至2正确识别出14眼中12眼房角镜检查显示可闭合房角的患者,而该检查识别出238眼无可闭合房角的患者,房角镜检查在250眼中识别出236眼。在PACG患者中,房角镜检查显示可闭合房角的36眼中,只有21眼CACD小于2.5mm。在其他15眼可闭合房角的患者中,CACD大于2.5mm。在本研究中,PACD在检测闭合房角方面表现良好,CACD也有用,但在已确诊的PACG病例中不如PACD有用。CACD为2.5mm或以上的PACG患者可能有高褶虹膜。PACD和CACD都是识别尼日利亚受试者眼中可闭合房角的有用方法。