Armstrong Carol L, Gyato Kunsang, Awadalla Abdel W, Lustig Robert, Tochner Zelig A
Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Medical School, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2004 Mar;14(1):65-86. doi: 10.1023/b:nerv.0000026649.68781.8e.
We critically examined the damaging affects of therapeutic irradiation by comparing results from cross-disciplinary studies of early- and late-delayed radiotherapy effects. Focus is attained by concentrating on clinical treatment issues (volume of brain, dose, timing of effects, age, modality types, and stereotactic treatment techniques), rather than on methodological means or problems, which is necessary to understand the mechanisms and characteristics of radiotherapy-induced behavioral dysfunction including cognition. We make observations and hypotheses about the actual risks from radiotherapy that could be informative in the treatment decision process, and which may lessen the concerns of some patients and their families about the risks they take when receiving radiation. Conditions that predispose to radiation injury are reviewed: (1) higher doses even to part of the brain versus lower doses to the whole brain, (2) combined treatment modalities, (3) malignancy itself, (4) radiation early during postnatal brain development, and (5) late-delayed effects (more than 3 years posttreatment). Current neurocognitive frameworks for understanding cognitive change over time in children and adults are summarized, along with the literature on effects of brain tumors and treatment on depression. No studies have as yet identified candidate brain regions that are more sensitive to radiotherapy. Two studies have provided early, preliminary evidence for a specific vulnerability of visual attention/memory to the early stage of late radiation damage. Furthermore, radiation effects appear severe only in a minority of patients. Risk is related to direct and indirect effects of cancer type, concurrent clinical factors, and premorbid risk factors.
我们通过比较早期和晚期延迟放疗效应的跨学科研究结果,严格审查了治疗性辐射的有害影响。通过关注临床治疗问题(脑体积、剂量、效应发生时间、年龄、治疗方式类型和立体定向治疗技术)来实现重点关注,而不是关注方法手段或问题,这对于理解包括认知在内的放疗诱发行为功能障碍的机制和特征是必要的。我们对放疗的实际风险进行观察并提出假设,这些观察和假设在治疗决策过程中可能具有参考价值,并且可能减少一些患者及其家属对接受放疗时所承担风险的担忧。我们回顾了易引发辐射损伤的情况:(1)脑部部分区域接受较高剂量辐射与全脑接受较低剂量辐射;(2)联合治疗方式;(3)恶性肿瘤本身;(4)出生后脑发育早期接受辐射;(5)晚期延迟效应(治疗后超过3年)。总结了当前用于理解儿童和成人随时间认知变化的神经认知框架,以及关于脑肿瘤和治疗对抑郁症影响的文献。目前尚无研究确定对放疗更敏感的候选脑区。两项研究提供了早期的初步证据,表明视觉注意力/记忆对晚期辐射损伤早期具有特定易损性。此外,辐射效应仅在少数患者中表现严重。风险与癌症类型的直接和间接影响、并发临床因素以及病前风险因素有关。