Liu Zhiqian
New Zealand Forest Research Institute, PB 3020 Rotorua, New Zealand.
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2004 Jun 1;35(3-4):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2004.02.016.
Surfactants are almost always present in herbicide treatment solutions with the aim to improve spray droplet retention on and penetration of active ingredients (a.i.s) into plant foliage. The effects of surfactants on the foliar uptake of herbicides are complex and only partially understood. The influence of a range of non-ionic polyoxyethylene surfactants on the uptake of two herbicides, glyphosate and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), was compared using three plant species, wheat, broad bean and common lambsquarters. Surfactants of higher ethylene oxide (EO) content provided greater uptake enhancement for glyphosate, whereas those of lower EO content were more beneficial for 2,4-D uptake. Among surfactants of the same EO content, those containing a C(13)/C(15) linear alkane hydrophobe moiety appeared to be more efficient for promoting the uptake of both herbicides. When a suitable surfactant was used, glyphosate uptake into both bean and wheat foliage increased steadily with increasing surfactant concentration and reached a maximum at 0.5%. In the presence of a constant surfactant, higher percentage uptake of herbicide was obtained with higher a.i. concentrations for glyphosate, but with lower a.i. concentrations in the case of 2,4-D. In the presence of an organosilicone surfactant, the stomatal uptake of glyphosate varied with both surfactant concentration and plant species. The effect of non-silicone surfactants on the cuticular uptake of glyphosate also varied with plant species. It can be concluded that the effects of surfactants on foliar uptake of herbicides depend not only on their chemical structures (hydrophobe and hydrophile moieties) and concentration, but also on the physicochemical properties and concentration of a.i.s and the leaf surface character of the plant species.
表面活性剂几乎总是存在于除草剂处理溶液中,目的是提高喷雾液滴在植物叶片上的滞留率以及活性成分渗透到植物叶片中的能力。表面活性剂对除草剂叶面吸收的影响很复杂,目前仅部分为人所知。使用小麦、蚕豆和藜三种植物,比较了一系列非离子型聚氧乙烯表面活性剂对两种除草剂草甘膦和2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸(2,4-D)吸收的影响。环氧乙烷(EO)含量较高的表面活性剂对草甘膦的吸收促进作用更大,而EO含量较低的表面活性剂对2,4-D的吸收更有利。在相同EO含量的表面活性剂中,含有C(13)/C(15)直链烷烃疏水基团部分的表面活性剂似乎对促进两种除草剂的吸收更有效。当使用合适的表面活性剂时,随着表面活性剂浓度的增加,草甘膦在蚕豆和小麦叶片中的吸收量稳步增加,并在0.5%时达到最大值。在表面活性剂浓度恒定的情况下,草甘膦在较高活性成分浓度下除草剂的吸收百分比更高,但对于2,4-D而言,在较低活性成分浓度下吸收百分比更高。在有机硅表面活性剂存在的情况下,草甘膦的气孔吸收随表面活性剂浓度和植物种类而变化。非硅表面活性剂对草甘膦角质层吸收的影响也因植物种类而异。可以得出结论,表面活性剂对除草剂叶面吸收的影响不仅取决于其化学结构(疏水基团和亲水基团部分)和浓度,还取决于活性成分的物理化学性质和浓度以及植物种类的叶表面特性。