Menéndez J, Bastida F
Universidad de Huelva, Departamento de Ciencias Agroforestales, Campus Universitario de La Rábida, 21819-Palos de la Frontera, Huelva (Spain).
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2004;69(4):815-20.
The relationship between the spraying volume and glyphosate effectiveness has been widely studied over the years. Likewise, the effect of different adjuvants on glyphosate leaf adherence/penetration is currently well understood. However, not much is known about the way spraying volumes may influence these two herbicide properties or, in other words, which factor (adherence or penetration) is the limiting factor when spraying at low or high volumes of treatment. Using grass-weed Lolium rigidum and broad-leaved weed Portulaca oleracea as experimental systems, the effect of low (200 L ha(-1)) and high (800 L ha(-1)) spraying volumes and six commercial adjuvants (poly-l-p-menthene, a mixture of methyl oleate and palmitate, alkylglycol ester, dodecylbenzene ammonium sulphonate, and two paraffinic oils) plus ammonium sulfate on the effectiveness of five commercial glyphosate formulations has been studied under laboratory controlled conditions. Dose-response assays showed significant differences between low and high spraying volume treatments as expected, the former being much more effective than the latter. However, and in all commercial formulations and weed species tested, the best results at low spraying volumes were always obtained when formulating glyphosate with oils or their derivatives, with a minimal improvement observed in glyphosate/surfactant mixtures. On the contrary, both the use of ionic or non-ionic surfactants as glyphosate adjuvants gave the best results at high spraying volumes, with only a marginal success observed on paraffinic oils and fatty acidesters. Data point out glyphosate absorption as being a two-step process made up of adherence first and then penetration, both events being essential for glyphosate effectiveness. Under these terms, high performance glyphosate-rich low spraying volumes succeed by themselves in soaking leaf surfaces, penetration therefore being the main and only limiting factor, while low performance glyphosate-poor high spraying volumes fail to either soak or penetrate leaf cuticles. The use of penetrative agents such as oils is therefore advised as a single method to increase glyphosate effectiveness at low spraying volumes, whereas glyphosate treatments at high spraying volumes are better improved by using surfactant agents or surfactant + oil mixtures.
多年来,人们对喷雾量与草甘膦药效之间的关系进行了广泛研究。同样,目前人们也充分了解了不同助剂对草甘膦在叶片上的附着/渗透效果的影响。然而,对于喷雾量可能影响这两种除草剂特性的方式,或者换句话说,在低喷雾量或高喷雾量处理时,哪个因素(附着或渗透)是限制因素,人们了解得并不多。以禾本科杂草硬直黑麦草和阔叶杂草马齿苋为实验体系,在实验室控制条件下,研究了低喷雾量(200升/公顷)和高喷雾量(800升/公顷)以及六种商业助剂(聚-1-对薄荷烯、油酸甲酯和棕榈酸酯混合物、烷基二醇酯、十二烷基苯磺酸铵以及两种石蜡油)加硫酸铵对五种商业草甘膦制剂药效的影响。剂量-反应试验表明,正如预期的那样,低喷雾量处理和高喷雾量处理之间存在显著差异,前者比后者有效得多。然而,在所有测试的商业制剂和杂草种类中,当草甘膦与油类或其衍生物配用时,在低喷雾量下总能获得最佳效果,而在草甘膦/表面活性剂混合物中观察到的改善最小。相反,使用离子型或非离子型表面活性剂作为草甘膦助剂时,在高喷雾量下能获得最佳效果,而在石蜡油和脂肪酸酯上仅取得了微不足道的成功。数据表明,草甘膦的吸收是一个由附着和随后渗透组成的两步过程,这两个过程对于草甘膦的药效都至关重要。在这些条件下,富含草甘膦的高性能低喷雾量能够自行浸湿叶片表面,因此渗透是主要且唯一的限制因素,而低性能、草甘膦含量低的高喷雾量既无法浸湿也无法穿透叶片角质层。因此,建议使用油类等渗透剂作为提高低喷雾量下草甘膦药效的单一方法,而在高喷雾量下,使用表面活性剂或表面活性剂+油类混合物能更好地提高草甘膦处理效果。