Lee Eun Ah, Cho Hyung In, Kim Sam Soo, Lee Won Yong
Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Gu, Seoul 135-710, South Korea.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2004 Aug;10(6):363-8. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2004.04.008.
Some abnormal findings in routine MRI have been proposed as helpful discriminators for distinguishing multiple system atrophy (MSA) from Parkinson's disease (PD). However, what the most distinguishing MRI findings for MSA-p (parkinsonism dominant) or MSA-c (cerebellar dominant) are separately has not been systematically analyzed. To determine what the most helpful discriminators for MSA-p or MSA-c are and whether those findings are correlated with the presence of parkinsonism or cerebellar dysfunction, we compared 10 previously reported MRI findings in 36 patients with probable MSA-p, 27 patients with probable MSA-c and 30 patients with PD separately. In our results, hyperintense rim and putaminal atrophy among supratentorial parameters and the parameters of infratentorial atrophy were significantly prominent in MSA-p comparing to PD. Hyperintense rim showed the highest specificity in MSA-p patients (90.0%) with relatively suboptimal sensitivity (72.2%). In MSA-c, all infratentorial parameters had strong discriminating power comparing to PD. Signal increase in the middle cerebellar peduncle showed the highest specificity (100%) and had fair sensitivity (85.2%) in MSA-c. Compared between MSA-p and MSA-c, supratentorial parameters were not valid to differentiate MSA-c from MSA-p except for putaminal atrophy. On the contrary, infratentorial parameters were good for distinguishing MSA-c from MSA-p except dilatation of the fourth ventricle. Parkinsonism was not correlated with a hyperintense rim, but cerebellar symptoms were correlated with signal increase in the middle cerebellar peduncle. Our findings suggest the characteristic MRI can be helpful for differentiating MSA-p and MSA-c from PD, respectively, although they do not reflect the presence or lateralization of parkinsonism.
一些常规MRI检查中的异常表现被认为有助于鉴别多系统萎缩(MSA)和帕金森病(PD)。然而,MSA-p(帕金森综合征为主型)或MSA-c(小脑为主型)各自最具鉴别意义的MRI表现尚未得到系统分析。为了确定MSA-p或MSA-c最有用的鉴别指标,以及这些表现是否与帕金森综合征或小脑功能障碍的存在相关,我们分别比较了36例可能的MSA-p患者、27例可能的MSA-c患者和30例PD患者的10项先前报道的MRI表现。在我们的研究结果中,幕上参数中的高信号边缘和壳核萎缩以及幕下萎缩参数在MSA-p患者中与PD相比显著突出。高信号边缘在MSA-p患者中显示出最高的特异性(90.0%),但敏感性相对欠佳(72.2%)。在MSA-c中,与PD相比,所有幕下参数都具有很强的鉴别能力。小脑中脚信号增强在MSA-c中显示出最高的特异性(100%),且具有较好的敏感性(85.2%)。在MSA-p和MSA-c之间比较,除壳核萎缩外,幕上参数对区分MSA-c和MSA-p无效。相反,除第四脑室扩张外,幕下参数有助于区分MSA-c和MSA-p。帕金森综合征与高信号边缘无关,但小脑症状与小脑中脚信号增强相关。我们的研究结果表明,特征性的MRI有助于分别将MSA-p和MSA-c与PD区分开来,尽管它们并不能反映帕金森综合征的存在或定位。