Givens Marlea, Lapointe Marc
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, 29425, USAUSA.
Clin Ther. 2004 Jun;26(6):819-29. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90126-9.
Anemia is a common problem in critically ill patients. As a result, blood transfusions are often used in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. However, mounting evidence shows that blood transfusions may contribute to negative outcomes, such as transfusion-related infections, organ dysfunction, and immunosuppression. Supplementation with epoetin alfa is currently used in some medical centers to manage anemia in critically ill patients.
This review discusses the risks with blood transfusions and the clinical evidence supporting the use of epoetin alfa in managing edema during critical illness.
A search was conducted in MEDLINE and Current Contents (1966-2003) using the terms epoetin alfa, recombinant human erythropoietin, and anemia. Articles addressing anemia and the use of epoetin alfa in critically ill patients were selected and assessed. From this selection, the cited references addressing the etiology of anemia in the ICU and the risks associated with blood transfusions were manually extracted and reviewed.
Several reports have shown that critically ill patients display evidence of anemia due to a blunted erythropoietin response. One large, randomized, placebo-controlled study assessed the effect of SC epoetin alfa on blood transfusions in the ICU. In this study, 40, 000 IU administered weekly for up to 4 weeks resulted in an overall transfusion reduction (9.9% absolute risk reduction; P<0.001 ). Other, smaller studies using different dosing regimens in critically ill patients have also demonstrated that epoetin alfa can decrease the need for transfusion.
The use of epoetin alfa in critically ill patients can decrease the number of blood transfusions required during hospitalization, and potentially result in transfusion avoidance. Because of the scarce amount of evidence and the diversity of dosing regimens used used, no strict recommendations can be drawn from this review.
贫血是重症患者常见的问题。因此,重症监护病房(ICU)中常使用输血治疗。然而,越来越多的证据表明,输血可能导致不良后果,如输血相关感染、器官功能障碍和免疫抑制。目前一些医疗中心使用促红细胞生成素α补充剂来治疗重症患者的贫血。
本综述讨论输血的风险以及支持使用促红细胞生成素α治疗危重病期间水肿的临床证据。
在MEDLINE和《现刊目次》(1966 - 2003年)中检索,使用促红细胞生成素α、重组人促红细胞生成素和贫血等检索词。选择并评估了关于贫血以及促红细胞生成素α在重症患者中应用的文章。从这些文章中,人工提取并审查了引用的关于ICU中贫血病因和输血相关风险的参考文献。
多项报告表明,重症患者由于促红细胞生成素反应减弱而出现贫血迹象。一项大型随机安慰剂对照研究评估了皮下注射促红细胞生成素α对ICU输血的影响。在这项研究中,每周注射40000 IU,持续4周,总体输血减少(绝对风险降低9.9%;P<0.001)。其他针对重症患者使用不同给药方案的小型研究也表明,促红细胞生成素α可减少输血需求。
在重症患者中使用促红细胞生成素α可减少住院期间所需的输血量,并有可能避免输血。由于证据有限且使用的给药方案多样,本综述无法得出严格的建议。