Suppr超能文献

一项心理健康平等性测试:医院同时期使用情况审查结果的比较

A test of mental health parity: comparisons of outcomes of hospital concurrent utilization review.

作者信息

Murray Mary Ellen, Henriques Jeffrey B

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin - Madison, K6/340 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, 53792, USA.

出版信息

J Behav Health Serv Res. 2004 Jul-Sep;31(3):266-78. doi: 10.1007/BF02287290.

Abstract

The Mental Health Parity Act of 1996 had as its goal the equity of coverage of mental health care and physical health care. The purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes of hospital concurrent utilization review as a measure of the progress toward the equity goal. The study examined 4 years of denials of certification for reimbursement by payers of inpatient care (1998-2001). Psychiatry was first compared to clinical services with a like number of annual admissions and then compared to clinical services with a like number of concurrent reviews. For each year, psychiatry had the highest numbers of cases denied and patient days denied. The most frequent reason for a psychiatric denial was that the inpatient benefit level had been exceeded. There was only one instance, in 4 years, when this reason (benefit limit exceeded) was given for a patient with a physical illness. This study provides evidence of the current inequity of reimbursement for treatment of mental illness.

摘要

1996年的《精神健康平权法案》旨在实现精神健康护理和身体健康护理覆盖范围的公平性。本研究的目的是检验医院同时进行的利用情况审查的结果,以此作为衡量朝着公平目标进展的一项指标。该研究考察了4年中住院护理支付方拒绝报销认证的情况(1998 - 2001年)。首先将精神病学与年入院人数相同的临床服务进行比较,然后与同时审查次数相同的临床服务进行比较。每年,精神病学被拒绝的病例数和被拒绝的患者住院天数都是最多的。精神病学被拒绝的最常见原因是超过了住院福利水平。在4年中,只有1例因身体疾病患者出现了“超过福利限额”这一拒绝原因。这项研究提供了目前精神疾病治疗报销不公平的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验