Suppr超能文献

在长时间手术过程中,使用辐射保暖或强制空气保暖进行术中患者保暖。

Intraoperative patient warming using radiant warming or forced-air warming during long operations.

作者信息

Lee L, Leslie K, Kayak E, Myles P S

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, The Royal Melbourne and The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria.

出版信息

Anaesth Intensive Care. 2004 Jun;32(3):358-61. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0403200309.

Abstract

Forced-air warming is the most commonly used and effective method of active warming. A new radiant warming device (Suntouch, Fisher and Paykel) may provide an alternative when the skin surface available for warming is limited. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of the Suntouch radiant warmer and forced-air warming. With ethics committee approval 60 surgical patients having procedures anticipated to be more than two hours in duration were recruited. Patients were randomized to either radiant warming or forced-air warming. All intravenous fluids were warmed but prewarming was not used. The final intraoperative core temperatures (degrees C) for the radiant warming and forced-air warming groups were 36.0 +/- 0.5 and 36.4 +/- 0.6 (P=0.002) respectively. No other patient variables were significantly different. The Suntouch is not as effective as the forced air warming for intraoperative warming during long surgical procedures. The device may be useful when forced-air warming is not possible.

摘要

强制空气加温是最常用且有效的主动加温方法。当可用于加温的皮肤表面有限时,一种新型辐射加温设备(Suntouch,费雪派克医疗保健公司)可能提供一种替代方案。我们进行了一项随机对照试验,以比较Suntouch辐射加温器和强制空气加温的效果。经伦理委员会批准,招募了60例预计手术时间超过两小时的外科手术患者。患者被随机分为辐射加温和强制空气加温两组。所有静脉输液均进行了加温,但未采用预加温。辐射加温和强制空气加温组的最终术中核心温度(摄氏度)分别为36.0±0.5和36.4±0.6(P = 0.002)。没有其他患者变量存在显著差异。在长时间外科手术中,Suntouch在术中加温方面不如强制空气加温有效。当无法进行强制空气加温时,该设备可能会有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验