Edmonds M, McGuire H, Price J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD003200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003200.pub2.
Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is an illness characterised by persistent medically unexplained fatigue. CFS is a serious health-care problem with a prevalence of up to 3%. Treatment strategies for CFS include psychological, physical and pharmacological interventions.
To investigate the relative effectiveness of exercise therapy and control treatments for CFS.
CCDANCTR-Studies and CENTRAL were searched using "Chronic Fatigue" and Exercise. The Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and CFS conferences were handsearched. Experts in the field were contacted. Clinicaltrials.gov and controlled-trials.com were searched.
Only Randomised Controlled Trials (RCT) including participants with a clinical diagnosis of CFS and of any age were included.
The full articles of studies identified were inspected by two reviewers (ME and HMG). Continuous measures of outcome were combined using standardised mean differences. An overall effect size was calculated for each outcome with 95% confidence intervals. One sensitivity analysis was undertaken to test the robustness of the results.
Nine studies were identified for possible inclusion in this review, and five of those studies were included. At 12 weeks, those receiving exercise therapy were less fatigued than the control participants (SMD -0.77, 95% CIs -1.26 to -0.28). Physical functioning was significantly improved with exercise therapy group (SMD -0.64, CIs -0.96 to -0.33) but there were more dropouts with exercise therapy (RR 1.73, CIs 0.92 to 3.24). Depression was non-significantly improved in the exercise therapy group compared to the control group at 12 weeks (WMD -0.58, 95% CIs -2.08 to 0.92). Participants receiving exercise therapy were less fatigued than those receiving the antidepressant fluoxetine at 12 weeks (WMD -1.24, 95% CIs -5.31 to 2.83). Participants receiving the combination of the two interventions, exercise + fluoxetine, were less fatigued than those receiving exercise therapy alone at 12 weeks, although again the difference did not reach significance (WMD 3.74, 95% CIs -2.16 to 9.64). When exercise therapy was combined with patient education, those receiving the combination were less fatigued than those receiving exercise therapy alone at 12 weeks (WMD 0.70, 95% CIs -1.48 to 2.88).
REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is encouraging evidence that some patients may benefit from exercise therapy and no evidence that exercise therapy may worsen outcomes on average. However the treatment may be less acceptable to patients than other management approaches, such as rest or pacing. Patients with CFS who are similar to those in these trials should be offered exercise therapy, and their progress monitored Further high quality randomised studies are needed.
慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)是一种以持续存在医学上无法解释的疲劳为特征的疾病。CFS是一个严重的医疗保健问题,患病率高达3%。CFS的治疗策略包括心理、身体和药物干预。
研究运动疗法与CFS对照治疗的相对有效性。
使用“慢性疲劳”和“运动”检索Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CCDANCTR-Studies)和Cochrane系统评价数据库(CENTRAL)。手工检索《慢性疲劳综合征杂志》和CFS会议资料。联系该领域的专家。检索美国国立医学图书馆临床试验注册库(Clinicaltrials.gov)和受控试验注册库(controlled-trials.com)。
仅纳入包括临床诊断为CFS且年龄不限的参与者的随机对照试验(RCT)。
两名评价员(ME和HMG)检查所识别研究的全文。使用标准化均数差合并连续的结局指标。计算每个结局的总体效应量及95%置信区间。进行一项敏感性分析以检验结果的稳健性。
确定了9项可能纳入本综述的研究,其中5项研究被纳入。在12周时,接受运动疗法的患者比对照参与者疲劳程度更低(标准化均数差-0.77,95%置信区间-1.26至-0.28)。运动疗法组的身体功能显著改善(标准化均数差-0.64,置信区间-0.96至-0.33),但运动疗法组的退出人数更多(风险比1.73,置信区间0.92至3.