Chronicle E, Mulleners W
Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2430 Campus Road, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 96822.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD003226. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003226.pub2.
BACKGROUND: Anticonvulsant drugs seem to be useful in clinical practice for the prophylaxis of migraine. This might be explained by a variety of actions of these drugs in the central nervous system that are probably relevant to the pathophysiology of migraine. OBJECTIVES: To describe and assess the evidence from controlled trials on the efficacy and tolerability of anticonvulsants for preventing migraine attacks in adult patients with migraine. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE (from 1966 on) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Date of most recent search: April 2003. Additional information was gained from hand-searching specialist headache journals; correspondence with pharmaceutical companies, authors of reports, and experts in the field; and a wide variety of review articles and book chapters. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were required to be prospective, controlled trials of self-administered drug treatments taken regularly to prevent the occurrence of migraine attacks and/or to reduce the intensity of those attacks. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Studies were selected and data extracted by two independent reviewers. For migraine frequency data, standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated for individual studies and pooled across studies. For dichotomous data on significant reduction in migraine frequency, odds ratios (ORs) and numbers-needed-to-treat (NNTs) were similarly calculated. Adverse events were analyzed by calculating numbers-needed-to-harm (NNHs) for studies using similar agents. MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen papers were included in the review. Of these, 14 reported trials comparing anticonvulsants with placebo, as follows: four trials of divalproex sodium, three trials of topiramate, two trials of sodium valproate, two trials of gabapentin, and one trial each of carbamazepine, clonazepam, and lamotrigine. One paper reported a trial of sodium valproate versus an active comparator, flunarizine, and one trial of divalproex sodium versus placebo included a comparison against propranolol, also an active comparator. Data from 2024 patients were considered. Analysis of data from eight trials (n = 841) demonstrates that anticonvulsants, considered as a class, reduce migraine frequency by about 1.4 attacks per 28 days as compared to placebo (SMD -0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.93 to -0.26). Data from 10 trials (n = 1341) show that anticonvulsants, considered as a class, also more than double the number of patients for whom migraine frequency is reduced by 50% or more, relative to placebo (OR 3.90; 95% CI 2.61 to 5.82; NNT 3.8; 95% CI 3.2 to 4.6). For seven trials of sodium valproate and divalproex sodium, NNHs for five clinically important adverse events ranged from 6.6 to 16.3. For the three trials of topiramate, NNHs for eight adverse events (100-mg dose) ranged from 2.4 to 32.9. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: Anticonvulsants appear to be both effective in reducing migraine frequency and reasonably well tolerated. There is noticeable variation among individual agents, but there are insufficient data to know whether this is due to chance or variation in true efficacy. Neither clonazepam nor lamotrigine was superior to placebo (one trial each). Relatively few robust trials are available for agents other than sodium valproate/divalproex sodium. Two recently published and large trials of topiramate demonstrated reasonable efficacy, and one further trial of this agent is anticipated in the near future.
背景:抗惊厥药物在偏头痛的临床预防中似乎有用。这可能是由于这些药物在中枢神经系统中的多种作用,这些作用可能与偏头痛的病理生理学相关。 目的:描述和评估关于抗惊厥药物预防成年偏头痛患者偏头痛发作的疗效和耐受性的对照试验证据。 检索策略:我们检索了MEDLINE(自1966年起)和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)。最近一次检索日期:2003年4月。通过手工检索专业头痛杂志、与制药公司、报告作者及该领域专家通信以及查阅各种综述文章和书籍章节获取了更多信息。 选择标准:研究需为前瞻性、自我给药的药物治疗的对照试验,定期服用以预防偏头痛发作的发生和/或减轻发作强度。 数据收集与分析:由两名独立评审员选择研究并提取数据。对于偏头痛发作频率数据,计算各个研究的标准化均数差(SMD)并进行合并。对于偏头痛发作频率显著降低的二分数据,同样计算比值比(OR)和需治疗人数(NNT)。通过计算使用相似药物的研究的伤害需治疗人数(NNH)来分析不良事件。 主要结果:该综述纳入了15篇论文。其中,14篇报告了抗惊厥药物与安慰剂比较的试验,如下:丙戊酸二钠试验4项、托吡酯试验3项、丙戊酸钠试验2项、加巴喷丁试验2项、卡马西平、氯硝西泮和拉莫三嗪试验各1项。1篇论文报告了丙戊酸钠与活性对照药氟桂利嗪比较的试验,1项丙戊酸二钠与安慰剂比较的试验纳入了与普萘洛尔(也是活性对照药)的比较。纳入了2024例患者的数据。对8项试验(n = 841)的数据分析表明,作为一类药物,抗惊厥药物与安慰剂相比,可使偏头痛发作频率每28天减少约1.4次(SMD -0.60;95%置信区间[CI] -0.93至-0.26)。10项试验(n = 1341)的数据显示,作为一类药物,抗惊厥药物使偏头痛发作频率降低50%或更多的患者数量相对于安慰剂增加了一倍多(OR 3.90;95% CI 2.61至5.82;NNT 3.8;95% CI 3.2至4.6)。对于丙戊酸钠和丙戊酸二钠的7项试验,5种临床重要不良事件的NNH范围为6.6至16.3。对于托吡酯的3项试验,8种不良事件(100毫克剂量)的NNH范围为2.4至32.9。 综述作者结论:抗惊厥药物似乎在降低偏头痛发作频率方面有效且耐受性较好。各药物之间存在明显差异,但数据不足以确定这是由于偶然因素还是真正疗效的差异。氯硝西泮和拉莫三嗪均不优于安慰剂(各1项试验)。除丙戊酸钠/丙戊酸二钠外,其他药物的可靠试验相对较少。最近发表的两项托吡酯大型试验显示出合理的疗效,预计近期还会有该药物的另一项试验。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-4-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-7-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-6-25
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-7-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-6-28
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020-12-28
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-2
Nat Rev Neurol. 2016-7-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-1-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-7-24