Suppr超能文献

β受体阻滞剂预防成人头痛:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Beta-blockers for the prevention of headache in adults, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America.

Department of General Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Mar 20;14(3):e0212785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212785. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Headaches are a common source of pain and suffering. The study's purpose was to assess beta-blockers efficacy in preventing migraine and tension-type headache.

METHODS

Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE; EMBASE; ISI Web of Science, clinical trial registries, CNKI, Wanfang and CQVIP were searched through 21 August 2018, for randomized trials in which at least one comparison was a beta-blocker for the prevention of migraine or tension-type headache in adults. The primary outcome, headache frequency per month, was extracted in duplicate and pooled using random effects models.

DATA SYNTHESIS

This study included 108 randomized controlled trials, 50 placebo-controlled and 58 comparative effectiveness trials. Compared to placebo, propranolol reduced episodic migraine headaches by 1.5 headaches/month at 8 weeks (95% CI: -2.3 to -0.65) and was more likely to reduce headaches by 50% (RR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.7). Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) found that these outcomes were unlikely to be due to a Type I error. A network analysis suggested that beta-blocker's benefit for episodic migraines may be a class effect. Trials comparing beta-blockers to other interventions were largely single, underpowered trials. Propranolol was comparable to other medications known to be effective including flunarizine, topiramate and valproate. For chronic migraine, propranolol was more likely to reduce headaches by at least 50% (RR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.0-4.3). There was only one trial of beta-blockers for tension-type headache.

CONCLUSIONS

There is high quality evidence that propranolol is better than placebo for episodic migraine headache. Other comparisons were underpowered, rated as low-quality based on only including single trials, making definitive conclusions about comparative effectiveness impossible. There were few trials examining beta-blocker effectiveness for chronic migraine or tension-type headache though there was limited evidence of benefit.

REGISTRATION

Prospero (ID: CRD42017050335).

摘要

背景

头痛是常见的疼痛来源。本研究的目的是评估β受体阻滞剂在预防偏头痛和紧张型头痛中的疗效。

方法

通过 Cochrane 对照试验注册库、MEDLINE、EMBASE、ISI Web of Science、临床试验注册库、中国知网、万方和维普,检索 2018 年 8 月 21 日之前的随机试验,比较至少有一种比较药物为β受体阻滞剂的成年人偏头痛或紧张型头痛预防的研究。每月头痛发作频率为主要结局指标,采用重复测量和随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。

数据综合

本研究纳入了 108 项随机对照试验,其中 50 项为安慰剂对照试验,58 项为比较有效性试验。与安慰剂相比,普萘洛尔在 8 周时可减少 1.5 次偏头痛发作/月(95%CI:-2.3 至-0.65),更有可能减少 50%的头痛发作(RR:1.4,95%CI:1.1-1.7)。试验序贯分析(TSA)发现这些结果不太可能是由于Ⅰ类错误。网络分析表明,β受体阻滞剂对偏头痛的益处可能是一种类效应。与其他干预措施相比,比较β受体阻滞剂的试验大多是单中心、低功率的试验。普萘洛尔与其他已知有效的药物(如氟桂利嗪、托吡酯和丙戊酸钠)相当。对于慢性偏头痛,普萘洛尔更有可能减少至少 50%的头痛发作(RR:2.0,95%CI:1.0-4.3)。只有一项关于紧张型头痛的β受体阻滞剂试验。

结论

有高质量证据表明普萘洛尔对偏头痛发作比安慰剂更有效。其他比较的试验功率不足,仅基于单中心试验进行评估,因此无法对比较有效性得出明确结论。尽管有有限的证据表明有效,但针对慢性偏头痛或紧张型头痛的β受体阻滞剂疗效的试验很少。

登记

PROSPERO(ID:CRD42017050335)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76fb/6426199/beae38439e8f/pone.0212785.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验