Schust M
Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Berlin, Germany.
Noise Health. 2004 Apr-Jun;6(23):73-85.
This review concentrates on the effects of low frequency noise (LFN) up to 100 Hz on selected physiological parameters, subjective complaints and performance. The results of laboratory experiments and field studies are discussed in relation to the thresholds of hearing, of vibrotactile sensation and of aural pain. The effects of LFN may be mediated trough different ways. Temporary or permanent hearing threshold shifts seem to be due to acoustic stimuli above the individual hearing threshold. However, non-aural physiological and psychological effects may be caused by levels of low frequency noise below the individual hearing threshold. The dynamic range between the thresholds of hearing and of aural pain diminishes with decreasing frequency. This should be taken into account by the setting of limits concerning the health risks. Sufficient safety margins are recommended. The use of a frequency weighting with an attenuation of the low frequencies (e.g. G-weighting) does not seem to be appropriate for the evaluation of the health risks caused by LFN up to 100 Hz. It may be proposed to measure third octave band spectra or narrow band spectra. A comparison with the known human responses caused by the measured levels and frequencies could help to evaluate the health risks. Some proposals for further investigations were given: (1) experimental methods to discover the ways mediating the effects of low frequency noise, (2) consideration of the individual hearing threshold or hearing threshold shift and of the vibrotactile threshold in the low frequency range to be able to judge the effects, (3) consideration of combined body vibration caused by airborne low frequency noise or by other sources, (4) modelling to analyse the transmission of the acoustic energy from the input into the body to the structures containing sensors, (5) consideration of probable risk groups like children or pregnant women.
本综述聚焦于高达100赫兹的低频噪声(LFN)对选定生理参数、主观不适及工作表现的影响。结合听力阈值、振动触觉阈值及耳痛阈值,对实验室实验和现场研究结果进行了讨论。低频噪声的影响可能通过不同方式介导。暂时或永久性听力阈值变化似乎是由高于个体听力阈值的声学刺激所致。然而,低于个体听力阈值的低频噪声水平可能会引起非听觉方面的生理和心理影响。随着频率降低,听力阈值与耳痛阈值之间的动态范围减小。在设定健康风险限值时应考虑到这一点。建议设置足够的安全裕度。对于评估高达100赫兹的低频噪声所造成的健康风险而言,采用对低频有衰减作用的频率加权(如G加权)似乎并不合适。或许可以提议测量1/3倍频程带谱或窄带谱。将测量的声级和频率与已知的人体反应进行比较,可能有助于评估健康风险。给出了一些进一步研究的建议:(1)采用实验方法来探寻介导低频噪声影响的途径;(2)考虑个体听力阈值或听力阈值变化以及低频范围内的振动触觉阈值,以便能够判断其影响;(3)考虑由空气传播的低频噪声或其他来源引起的身体振动;(4)进行建模分析,以研究声能从输入到身体再到包含传感器的结构的传输过程;(5)考虑儿童或孕妇等可能的风险群体。