Merz Liana R, Warren David K, Kollef Marin H, Fraser Victoria J
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Aug;48(8):2861-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.8.2861-2865.2004.
Various interventions have been proposed to combat the increase of antibiotic resistance and influence antibiotic prescribing practices. A prospective cohort study in a medical intensive care unit was conducted to determine the effect of an antibiotic cycling program on patterns of antibiotic use and to determine patient factors associated with cycling adherence. Four major classes of antibiotics for empirical therapy of suspected gram-negative bacterial infections were rotated at 3- and 4-month intervals. During the study, 1,003 patients received antibiotic therapy with at least one of the study drugs; of the 792 receiving cycle antibiotics during the cycling period, 598 (75.5%) received an on-cycle drug. Compared to the baseline, cycling recommendations increased the use of the target cycle agent: the use of cephalosporins increased during cycle 1 (56 to 64% of total antibiotic days, P < 0.001), fluoroquinolone use increased in cycle 2 (24 to 55%, P < 0.001), carbapenem use increased during cycle 3 (14 to 38%, P < 0.001), and use of extended-spectrum penicillins increased in cycle 4 (5 to 36%, P < 0.001). Overall, 48% of total cycle antibiotic days were compliant with the cycling protocol. On average, 8.8 days per patient were spent receiving on-cycle drugs (range, 1 to 109). Cycle periods that specified carbapenem and fluoroquinolone use had the highest number of off-cycle days (62 and 64%). Predictors of on-cycle antibiotic use were increased severity of illness, as measured by an acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score, and greater length of intensive care unit stay. In conclusion, the successful implementation of this cycling protocol increased antibiotic heterogeneity over time in the study unit.
人们已经提出了各种干预措施来应对抗生素耐药性的增加,并影响抗生素的处方行为。在一个医疗重症监护病房进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,以确定抗生素循环方案对抗生素使用模式的影响,并确定与循环依从性相关的患者因素。用于疑似革兰氏阴性菌感染经验性治疗的四大类抗生素每隔3至4个月轮换一次。在研究期间,1003名患者接受了至少一种研究药物的抗生素治疗;在循环期接受循环抗生素治疗的792名患者中,598名(75.5%)接受了循环内药物。与基线相比,循环建议增加了目标循环药物的使用:头孢菌素的使用在第1周期增加(从占抗生素总天数的56%增至64%,P<0.001),氟喹诺酮类药物的使用在第2周期增加(从24%增至55%,P<0.001),碳青霉烯类药物的使用在第3周期增加(从14%增至38%,P<0.001),广谱青霉素的使用在第4周期增加(从5%增至36%,P<0.001)。总体而言,循环抗生素总天数的48%符合循环方案。平均而言,每位患者接受循环内药物治疗的天数为8.8天(范围为1至109天)。指定使用碳青霉烯类和氟喹诺酮类药物的循环期非循环天数最多(分别为62%和64%)。循环内抗生素使用的预测因素是疾病严重程度增加(通过急性生理学和慢性健康评估II评分衡量)以及重症监护病房住院时间更长。总之,随着时间的推移,该循环方案的成功实施增加了研究单位内抗生素的异质性。