Fosså Sophie D, Mickisch Gerald H J, De Mulder Pieter H M, Horenblas Simon, van Oosterom Allan T, van Poppel Hein, Fey Martin, Croles Jelle J, de Prijck Linda, Van Glabbeke Martine
Department of Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Cancer. 2004 Aug 1;101(3):533-40. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20307.
In patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC), interferon-alpha (IFN) monotherapy leads to response rates of 5-15%, dependent on the selection of patients. In 1995, preclinical and clinical data indicated an improvement of these results if IFN was combined with 13-cis retinoic acid (CRA).
In a randomized Phase II study, patients with measurable MRCC received either subcutaneous IFN (9 MU daily; Arm A) or the same daily subcutaneous dose of IFN plus oral CRA (1 mg/kg; Arm B). A central expert panel reviewed the X-ray documentation of objective responses.
In the 50 eligible patients from Arm A, the objective, expert-reviewed response rate was 6% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.3-16.6%; 2 complete responses [CRs] and 1 partial response [PR]). A 19% response rate (95% CI, 9.4-32.0%) was stated for 53 eligible patients from Arm B (2 CRs and 8 PRs). Only one of the four CRs claimed by the clinical investigator was confirmed by the central review committee. Conversely, the expert committee deemed that 3 of 12 investigator-stated PRs were CRs. Constitutional toxicity (flu-like symptoms) and/or side effects from skin, mucosa, or eyes led to discontinuation of treatment in 22% of nonprogressing patients, more often in Arm B than in Arm A.
The results from this randomized Phase II study support expansion of the trial into a Phase III study to evaluate the effect of IFN-CRA combination therapy on the survival of patients who undergo nephrectomy prior to IFN-based immunotherapy. The considerable interobserver variability of response evaluation (individual investigator vs. expert panel) indicates the necessity of a central review of claimed responses in future Phase II studies involving patients with MRCC.
在转移性肾细胞癌(MRCC)患者中,α干扰素(IFN)单药治疗的缓解率为5%-15%,这取决于患者的选择。1995年,临床前和临床数据表明,如果IFN与13-顺式维甲酸(CRA)联合使用,这些结果会有所改善。
在一项随机II期研究中,可测量的MRCC患者接受皮下注射IFN(每日9 MU;A组)或相同每日皮下剂量的IFN加口服CRA(1 mg/kg;B组)。一个中央专家小组审查了客观缓解的X线记录。
A组的50名合格患者中,经专家审查的客观缓解率为6%(95%置信区间[95%CI],1.3%-16.6%;2例完全缓解[CR]和1例部分缓解[PR])。B组的53名合格患者的缓解率为19%(95%CI,9.4%-32.0%)(2例CR和8例PR)。临床研究者声称的4例CR中只有1例得到中央审查委员会的确认。相反,专家委员会认为研究者声称的12例PR中有3例为CR。体质性毒性(类流感症状)和/或皮肤、黏膜或眼睛的副作用导致22%的无进展患者停止治疗,B组比A组更常见。
这项随机II期研究的结果支持将试验扩展为III期研究,以评估IFN-CRA联合治疗对在基于IFN的免疫治疗前接受肾切除术的患者生存的影响。缓解评估中观察者间的显著差异(个体研究者与专家小组)表明,在未来涉及MRCC患者的II期研究中,对声称的缓解进行中央审查是必要的。