Watt-Watson Judy, Hunter Judi, Pennefather Peter, Librach Larry, Raman-Wilms Lalitha, Schreiber Martin, Lax Leila, Stinson Jennifer, Dao Thuan, Gordon Allan, Mock David, Salter Michael
Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 50 St. George Street, Toronto, Ont., Canada M5S 3H4.
Pain. 2004 Jul;110(1-2):140-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.03.019.
Pain education, especially for undergraduates, has been identified as important to changing problematic pain practices, yet, no published data were found describing an integrated, interprofessional pain curriculum for undergraduate students. Therefore, this project aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate an integrated pain curriculum, based on the International Association for the Study of Pain curricula [http://www.iasp-pain.org/curropen.html], for 540 students from six Health Science Faculties/Departments. Over an 18-month period, the University of Toronto Centre for the Study of Pain's Interfaculty Pain Education Committee developed a 20-h undergraduate pain curriculum to be delivered during a 1-week period. Students from Dentistry, Medicine, Nursing, Pharmacy, Physical Therapy, and Occupational Therapy participated as part of their 2nd or 3rd year program. Teaching strategies included large and small groups, Standardized Patients, and 63 facilitators. Evaluation methods included: (a) pre- and post-tests of the Pain Knowledge and Beliefs Questionnaire (PKBQ) and (b) Daily Content and Process Questionnaire (DCPQ) to obtain feedback about process, content, and format across the curriculum's 5 days. A significant improvement in pain knowledge and beliefs was demonstrated (t = 181.28, P < 0.001), although non-responders were problematic at the post-test. DCPQ overall ratings of 'exceeding or meeting expectations' ranged from 74 to 92%. Ratings were highest for the patient-related content and panel, and the small-group discussions with Standardized Patients. Overall evaluations were positive, and statistically significant changes were demonstrated in students' pain knowledge and beliefs. This unique and valuable learning opportunity will be repeated with some modifications next year.
疼痛教育,尤其是针对本科生的疼痛教育,已被视为改变有问题的疼痛治疗方法的重要因素。然而,尚未发现有已发表的数据描述针对本科生的综合跨专业疼痛课程。因此,本项目旨在为来自六个健康科学学院/系的540名学生,基于国际疼痛研究协会的课程[http://www.iasp-pain.org/curropen.html],开发、实施并评估一门综合疼痛课程。在18个月的时间里,多伦多大学疼痛研究中心的跨学院疼痛教育委员会制定了一门为期20小时的本科疼痛课程,将在一周内授课。来自牙医学、医学、护理学、药学、物理治疗学和职业治疗学专业的学生作为其二年级或三年级课程的一部分参与其中。教学策略包括大班和小组教学、标准化病人以及63名辅导员。评估方法包括:(a) 疼痛知识与信念问卷(PKBQ)的课前和课后测试,以及 (b) 每日内容与过程问卷(DCPQ),以获取关于课程五天内的过程、内容和形式的反馈。尽管在后测时有未作答者带来问题,但疼痛知识和信念有显著改善(t = 181.28,P < 0.001)。DCPQ中“超过或达到期望”的总体评分范围为74%至92%。与患者相关的内容和小组讨论以及与标准化病人的小组讨论评分最高。总体评价是积极的,并且学生的疼痛知识和信念有统计学上的显著变化。这个独特且有价值的学习机会明年将进行一些修改后再次开展。