Suppr超能文献

单侧乳房重建中双蒂横行腹直肌肌皮瓣的技术变异:蒂部转移的传统技术与显微外科技术对并发症发生率的影响

Technical variations of the bipedicled TRAM flap in unilateral breast reconstruction: effects of conventional versus microsurgical techniques of pedicle transfer on complications rates.

作者信息

Ng Roy L H, Youssef Adel, Kronowitz Steven J, Lipa Joan E, Potochny John, Reece Gregory P

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, and the Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, 77030, USA.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Aug;114(2):374-84; discussion 385-8. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000131879.34814.8a.

Abstract

In cases of unilateral breast reconstruction with a transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap, poorly perfused tissue, which is normally excised to avoid subsequent fat necrosis, must sometimes be used to achieve adequate breast size and projection. In such cases, incorporation of a second vascular pedicle into the flap design improves perfusion. The authors retrospectively examined their experience with bipedicled TRAM flap-based unilateral breast reconstruction to determine whether the use of microsurgical rather than conventional (nonmicrosurgical) techniques for flap transfer resulted in lower incidences of flap-site fat necrosis and donor-site hernia/bulge. The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with a bipedicled TRAM or deep inferior epigastric perforator flap between January of 1991 and March of 2001. Group 1 consisted of patients who had undergone flap transfer using a conventional technique for both pedicles; group 2, patients who had flap transfer using a conventional technique for one pedicle and a microsurgical technique for the other; and group 3, patients who had flap transfer using a microsurgical technique for both pedicles. Of the 863 patients identified, 72 (8.3 percent) had undergone reconstruction using a bipedicled flap. There were 43 patients in group 1, 24 patients in group 2, and five patients in group 3. Only one case of total flap loss had occurred (group 1). Partial flap loss occurred in two patients in group 1 (5 percent) and three patients in group 2 (13 percent). Fat necrosis occurred more frequently in groups 1 (23 percent) and 2 (29 percent) than in group 3 (0 percent) (p = 0.5, Fisher's exact test). Similarly, bulge or hernia was more common in groups 1 (12 percent) and 2 (4 percent) than in group 3 (0 percent) (p = 0.6, Fisher's exact test). In this study, patients who received a bipedicled TRAM flap using microsurgical techniques alone (group 3) appeared to have better flap perfusion and less frequent hernia/bulge than did patients who underwent flap transfer using conventional (group 1) or combined techniques (group 2). However, these differences were not statistically significant, and this trend must be verified in a larger study.

摘要

在采用横行腹直肌肌皮瓣(TRAM瓣)进行单侧乳房重建的病例中,有时必须使用通常会被切除以避免后续脂肪坏死的灌注不良组织,以达到足够的乳房大小和凸度。在此类情况下,在皮瓣设计中加入第二个血管蒂可改善灌注。作者回顾性分析了他们使用双蒂TRAM瓣进行单侧乳房重建的经验,以确定皮瓣转移采用显微外科技术而非传统(非显微外科)技术是否会降低皮瓣部位脂肪坏死和供区疝/隆起的发生率。作者回顾性查阅了1991年1月至2001年3月间所有采用双蒂TRAM瓣或腹壁下深动脉穿支瓣进行单侧乳房重建患者的病历。第1组由双侧皮瓣转移均采用传统技术的患者组成;第2组由一侧皮瓣转移采用传统技术而另一侧采用显微外科技术的患者组成;第3组由双侧皮瓣转移均采用显微外科技术的患者组成。在确定的863例患者中,72例(8.3%)采用双蒂瓣进行了重建。第1组有43例患者,第2组有24例患者,第3组有5例患者。仅发生了1例皮瓣完全坏死(第1组)。第1组有2例患者(5%)发生了部分皮瓣坏死,第2组有3例患者(13%)发生了部分皮瓣坏死。第1组(23%)和第2组(29%)的脂肪坏死发生率高于第3组(0%)(p = 0.5,Fisher精确检验)。同样,第1组(12%)和第2组(4%)的隆起或疝发生率高于第3组(0%)(p = 0.6,Fisher精确检验)。在本研究中,仅采用显微外科技术接受双蒂TRAM瓣的患者(第3组)似乎比采用传统技术(第1组)或联合技术(第2组)进行皮瓣转移的患者皮瓣灌注更好,疝/隆起发生率更低。然而,这些差异无统计学意义,这一趋势必须在更大规模的研究中得到验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验