Suppr超能文献

针对成年血液系统恶性肿瘤患者,单中心无关供者骨髓移植与脐血移植的比较分析

Single-institute comparative analysis of unrelated bone marrow transplantation and cord blood transplantation for adult patients with hematologic malignancies.

作者信息

Takahashi Satoshi, Iseki Tohru, Ooi Jun, Tomonari Akira, Takasugi Kashiya, Shimohakamada Yoko, Yamada Toshiki, Uchimaru Kaoru, Tojo Arinobu, Shirafuji Naoki, Kodo Hideki, Tani Kenzaburo, Takahashi Tsuneo, Yamaguchi Takuhiro, Asano Shigetaka

机构信息

Division of Molecular Therapy, The Advanced Clinical Research Center, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, 6-1, Shirokanedai-4, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639 Japan.

出版信息

Blood. 2004 Dec 1;104(12):3813-20. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-03-1001. Epub 2004 Jul 27.

Abstract

Unrelated cord blood transplantation (CBT) has now become more common, but as yet there have been only a few reports on its outcome compared with bone marrow transplantation (BMT), especially for adults. We studied the clinical outcomes of 113 adult patients with hematologic malignancies who received unrelated BM transplants (n = 45) or unrelated CB transplants (n = 68). We analyzed the hematopoietic recovery, rates of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), risks of transplantation-related mortality (TRM) and relapse, and disease-free survival (DFS) using Cox proportional hazards models. The time from donor search to transplantation was significantly shorter among CB transplant recipients (median, 2 months) than BM transplant recipients (median, 11 months; P < .01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated slow neutrophil (P < .01) and platelet (P < .01) recoveries in CBT patients compared with BMT patients. Despite rapid tapering of immunosuppressants after transplantation and infrequent use of steroids to treat severe acute GVHD, there were no GVHD-related deaths among CB transplant recipients compared with 10 deaths of 24 among BM transplant recipients. Unrelated CBT showed better TRM and DFS results compared with BMT (P = .02 and P < .01, respectively), despite the higher human leukocyte antigen mismatching rate and lower number of infused cells. These data strongly suggest that CBT could be safely and effectively used for adult patients with hematologic malignancies.

摘要

非亲缘脐血移植(CBT)现已变得更为常见,但与骨髓移植(BMT)相比,关于其结果的报道仍较少,尤其是在成人患者中。我们研究了113例接受非亲缘骨髓移植(n = 45)或非亲缘脐血移植(n = 68)的血液系统恶性肿瘤成年患者的临床结果。我们使用Cox比例风险模型分析了造血恢复、移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)发生率、移植相关死亡率(TRM)和复发风险以及无病生存期(DFS)。脐血移植受者从寻找供者到移植的时间(中位数为2个月)明显短于骨髓移植受者(中位数为11个月;P <.01)。多变量分析表明,与骨髓移植患者相比,脐血移植患者的中性粒细胞(P <.01)和血小板(P <.01)恢复缓慢。尽管移植后免疫抑制剂迅速减量且很少使用类固醇治疗严重急性GVHD,但脐血移植受者中没有与GVHD相关的死亡,而骨髓移植受者中有24例死亡,其中10例与GVHD相关。尽管人类白细胞抗原错配率较高且输入细胞数量较少,但与骨髓移植相比,非亲缘脐血移植的TRM和DFS结果更好(分别为P =.02和P <.01)。这些数据强烈表明,脐血移植可安全有效地用于成年血液系统恶性肿瘤患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验