Suppr超能文献

清髓性预处理方案后,对成年血液系统恶性肿瘤患者进行无关供者脐血移植与相关供者骨髓或外周血干细胞移植的单机构比较分析。

Comparative single-institute analysis of cord blood transplantation from unrelated donors with bone marrow or peripheral blood stem-cell transplants from related donors in adult patients with hematologic malignancies after myeloablative conditioning regimen.

作者信息

Takahashi Satoshi, Ooi Jun, Tomonari Akira, Konuma Takaaki, Tsukada Nobuhiro, Oiwa-Monna Maki, Fukuno Kenji, Uchiyama Michihiro, Takasugi Kashiya, Iseki Tohru, Tojo Arinobu, Yamaguchi Takuhiro, Asano Shigetaka

机构信息

Division of Molecular Therapy, Institute of Medical Science, Department of Biostatistics/Epidemiology and Preventive Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences and Nursing, University of Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Blood. 2007 Feb 1;109(3):1322-30. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-020172. Epub 2006 Oct 12.

Abstract

We studied the clinical outcomes of 171 adults with hematologic malignancies who received unrelated cord blood transplantation (CBT) as a primary unrelated stem-cell source (n=100), or bone marrow transplant (BMT) or peripheral blood stem-cell transplant (PBSCT) from related donors (n=71, 55 BMT and 16 PBSCT). All patients received myeloablative regimens including 12 Gy total body irradiation. We analyzed the hematologic recovery, and risks of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), transplantation-related mortality (TRM) and relapse, and disease-free survival (DFS) using Cox proportional hazards models. Significant delays in engraftment occurred after cord blood transplantation; however, overall engraftment rates were almost the same for both grafts. The cumulative incidences of grades III to IV acute and extensive-type chronic GVHDs among CBT recipients were significantly lower than those among BMT/PBSCT recipients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated no apparent differences in TRM (9% in CBT and 13% in BMT/PBSCT recipients), relapse (17% in CBT and 26% in BMT/PBSCT recipients), and DFS (70% in CBT and 60% in BMT/PBSCT recipients) between both groups. These data suggest that unrelated cord blood could be as safe and effective a stem-cell source as related bone marrow or mobilized peripheral blood for adult patients when it is used as a primary unrelated stem-cell source.

摘要

我们研究了171例血液系统恶性肿瘤成年患者的临床结局,这些患者接受了非亲属脐血移植(CBT)作为主要的非亲属干细胞来源(n = 100),或接受了来自亲属供者的骨髓移植(BMT)或外周血干细胞移植(PBSCT)(n = 71,其中55例为BMT,16例为PBSCT)。所有患者均接受了包括12 Gy全身照射的清髓方案。我们使用Cox比例风险模型分析了血液学恢复情况、移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)风险、移植相关死亡率(TRM)和复发情况以及无病生存期(DFS)。脐血移植后造血恢复出现明显延迟;然而,两种移植物的总体植入率几乎相同。CBT受者中III至IV级急性和广泛型慢性GVHD的累积发生率显著低于BMT/PBSCT受者。多因素分析显示,两组之间在TRM(CBT受者为9%,BMT/PBSCT受者为13%)、复发(CBT受者为17%,BMT/PBSCT受者为26%)和DFS(CBT受者为70%,BMT/PBSCT受者为60%)方面无明显差异。这些数据表明,对于成年患者,当非亲属脐血用作主要的非亲属干细胞来源时,其作为干细胞来源的安全性和有效性可与亲属骨髓或动员外周血相媲美。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验