Samanic Claudine, Hoppin Jane A, Lubin Jay H, Blair Aaron, Alavanja Michael C R
National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2005 May;15(3):225-33. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500396.
Exposure to certain pesticides has been linked with both acute and chronic adverse health outcomes such as neurotoxicity and risk for certain cancers. Univariate analyses of pesticide exposures may not capture the complexity of these exposures since use of various pesticides often occurs simultaneously, and because specific uses have changed over time. Using data from the Agricultural Health Study, a cohort study of 89,658 licensed pesticide applicators and their spouses in Iowa and North Carolina, we employed factor analysis to order to characterize underlying patterns of self-reported exposures to 50 different pesticides. Factor analysis is a statistical method used to explain the relationships between several correlated variables by reducing them to a smaller number of conceptually meaningful, composite variables, known as factors. Three factors emerged for farmer applicators (N=45,074): (1) Iowa agriculture and herbicide use, (2) North Carolina agriculture and use of insecticides, fumigants and fungicides, and (3) older age and use of chlorinated pesticides. The patterns observed for spouses of farmers (N=17,488) were similar to those observed for the farmers themselves, whereas five factors emerged for commercial pesticide applicators (N=4,384): (1) herbicide use, (2) older age and use of chlorinated pesticides, (3) use of fungicides and residential pest treatments, (4) use of animal insecticides, and (5) use of fumigants. Pesticide exposures did not correlate with lifestyle characteristics such as race, smoking status or education. This heterogeneity in exposure patterns may be used to guide etiologic studies of health effects of farmers and other groups exposed to pesticides.
接触某些农药与急性和慢性不良健康后果有关,如神经毒性和患某些癌症的风险。对农药接触情况进行单变量分析可能无法捕捉到这些接触的复杂性,这是因为各种农药的使用往往同时发生,而且特定的使用情况会随时间而变化。利用农业健康研究的数据,该研究对爱荷华州和北卡罗来纳州的89658名持证农药施用者及其配偶进行了队列研究,我们采用因子分析来描述自我报告的对50种不同农药接触的潜在模式。因子分析是一种统计方法,用于通过将几个相关变量简化为数量较少的、概念上有意义的复合变量(称为因子)来解释它们之间的关系。农民施用者(N = 45074)出现了三个因子:(1)爱荷华州农业与除草剂使用,(2)北卡罗来纳州农业与杀虫剂、熏蒸剂和杀菌剂的使用,以及(3)年龄较大与氯化农药的使用。农民配偶(N = 17488)观察到的模式与农民自身观察到的模式相似,而商业农药施用者(N = 4384)出现了五个因子:(1)除草剂使用,(2)年龄较大与氯化农药的使用,(3)杀菌剂使用与住宅害虫防治,(4)动物杀虫剂使用,以及(5)熏蒸剂使用。农药接触与种族、吸烟状况或教育程度等生活方式特征无关。这种接触模式的异质性可用于指导对农民和其他接触农药群体健康影响的病因学研究。