A critique of Hamel and Panicola.
作者信息
Diamond Eugene F
机构信息
Linacre Institute, Catholic Medical Associaiton, Palos Park, Illinois, USA.
出版信息
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q. 2004 Summer;4(2):240-3.
PMID:15281180
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
A critique of Hamel and Panicola.对哈梅尔和帕尼科拉的一篇评论。
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q. 2004 Summer;4(2):240-3.
2
Emergency contraception revisited: a response to Eugene Diamond.重新审视紧急避孕：对尤金·戴蒙德的回应。
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q. 2004 Summer;4(2):236-9.
3
Postcoital intervention--from fear of pregnancy to rape crisis.性交后干预——从对怀孕的恐惧到强奸危机。
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q. 2004 Summer;4(2):275-88.
4
A proposed novel treatment for rape victims.一种针对强奸受害者的新型治疗方案。
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q. 2005 Winter;5(4):687-95. doi: 10.5840/ncbq2005544.
5
The use of emergency hormonal contraception in cases of rape--revisiting the Catholic position.强奸案件中紧急激素避孕的使用——重新审视天主教的立场。
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics. 2005;11(2):35-42. doi: 10.1179/hrge.11.2.f760u1003820285g.
6
Why fear ovulation testing? A response to Ron Hamel.为何惧怕排卵测试？对罗恩·哈梅尔的回应。
Ethics Medics. 2003 Jun;28(6):3-4.
7
Rape and emergency contraception: a reply to Rev. Kevin McMahon.强奸与紧急避孕：对凯文·麦克马洪牧师的回应
Ethics Medics. 2003 Jun;28(6):1-2.
8
Peace of conscience for rape victims: ovulation testing and emergency contraception.为强奸受害者带来良心上的安宁：排卵测试与紧急避孕
Ethics Medics. 2003 Dec;28(12):1-2.
9
A response to: the use of emergency hormonal contraception in cases of rape--revisiting the Catholic position.对以下内容的回应：强奸案件中紧急激素避孕的使用——重新审视天主教的立场。
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics. 2005;11(2):40-2. doi: 10.1179/hrge.11.2.h70vn68628843512.
10
Contraceptive emergency: Catholic hospitals overwhelmingly refuse to provide EC.
Conscience. 2003 Summer;24(2):38-41.
Zotero 插件