Kerr Anne
Department of Sociology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.
New Genet Soc. 2003 Aug;22(2):143-58. doi: 10.1080/1463677032000102611.
The governance of genetics involves a wide range of policy networks and covers a considerable array of genetic technoscience. Despite this apparent diversity, the uniformity of some genetic governance requires investigation. Reviewing policy documents on genetic patenting and embryonic stem cell research, I shall argue that policy networks often conceive of the ethical aspects of these practices in similar ways. In particular, I shall argue that individual choice and medico-scientific progress are common rhetorical devices in their frameworks. I shall end by commenting upon the implications of these trends for the future.
遗传学治理涉及广泛的政策网络，涵盖了大量的基因技术科学领域。尽管存在这种明显的多样性，但某些基因治理的一致性仍需研究。通过审视关于基因专利和胚胎干细胞研究的政策文件，我将论证政策网络往往以相似的方式构想这些实践的伦理层面。特别是，我将论证个人选择和医学科学进步是其框架中常见的修辞手段。最后，我将对这些趋势对未来的影响进行评论。
