• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

世界卫生组织“残疾”分级的评分者间信度。

Inter-rater reliability of WHO 'disability' grading.

作者信息

Brandsma Wim, Larsen Meredith, Richard Charles, Ebenezer Mannam

机构信息

International Nepal Fellowship, Green Pastures Hospital and Rehabilitation Centre, PO Box 5, Pokhara, Nepal.

出版信息

Lepr Rev. 2004 Jun;75(2):131-4.

PMID:15282963
Abstract

The World Health Organization 'disability' grading system was introduced in 1960. It is mainly used as an indicator for early diagnosis or reporting. Disability grades are usually aggregated at national levels. Comparison of data with previous years or comparison of data between programmes may show that patients report earlier for treatment, alternatively, are diagnosed earlier, that is without, or with fewer 'disabilities'. Despite its long and universal use as an epidemiological parameter, the WHO disability grading has not been the subject of reliability studies. In this study, three testers unfamiliar with the grading prior to the study each graded 65 (former) leprosy affected persons. The weighted kappa ranged from 0.87 to 0.89 (95% CI 0.73-1.00) for the highest score and from 0.90 to 0.96 (95% CI 0.90-0.99) for the EHF (Eye, Hand, Foot) score, indicating excellent reliability. The study shows that with limited training and little experience a high degree of reliability in grading 'disabilities' between testers is attainable.

摘要

世界卫生组织的“残疾”分级系统于1960年推出。它主要用作早期诊断或报告的指标。残疾等级通常在国家层面进行汇总。将数据与前几年进行比较,或者比较不同项目之间的数据,可能会发现患者更早接受治疗,或者更早被诊断出来,也就是说没有残疾,或者残疾较少。尽管世界卫生组织残疾分级作为一种流行病学参数长期广泛使用,但尚未成为可靠性研究的主题。在本研究中,三位在研究前不熟悉该分级的测试人员对65名(以前)麻风病患者进行了分级。最高评分的加权kappa值在0.87至0.89之间(95%可信区间0.73 - 1.00),EHF(眼、手、足)评分的加权kappa值在0.90至0.96之间(95%可信区间0.90 - 0.99),表明可靠性极佳。该研究表明,通过有限的培训和少量经验,测试人员之间在“残疾”分级方面可实现高度可靠性。

相似文献

1
Inter-rater reliability of WHO 'disability' grading.世界卫生组织“残疾”分级的评分者间信度。
Lepr Rev. 2004 Jun;75(2):131-4.
2
Measuring impairment caused by leprosy: inter-tester reliability of the WHO disability grading system.测量麻风病所致损伤:世界卫生组织残疾分级系统的测试者间可靠性
Lepr Rev. 2004 Sep;75(3):221-32.
3
WHO disability grading: operational definitions.世界卫生组织残疾分级:操作定义。
Lepr Rev. 2003 Dec;74(4):366-73.
4
Disability grading in leprosy: current status.麻风病的残疾分级:现状
Indian J Lepr. 1994 Jul-Sep;66(3):299-306.
5
Grading impairment in leprosy.麻风病损伤分级
Lepr Rev. 1999 Jun;70(2):180-8. doi: 10.5935/0305-7518.19990021.
6
[Use of the WHODAS II with stroke patients and their relatives: reliability and inter-rater-reliability].《世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版在中风患者及其亲属中的应用:信度和评分者间信度》
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2008 Feb;47(1):31-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-985168.
7
[Physical disabilities in Hansen's disease at the time of diagnosis. I. Disability evaluation].[麻风病诊断时的身体残疾。I. 残疾评估]
Hansenol Int. 1987 Dec;12(2):21-8.
8
WHO disability grade does not influence physical activity in Brazilian leprosy patients.世界卫生组织残疾分级不影响巴西麻风病患者的身体活动。
Lepr Rev. 2011 Sep;82(3):270-8.
9
[Inter-rater reliability while using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) in patients with cervical dystonia].[在颈部肌张力障碍患者中使用多伦多西部痉挛性斜颈评定量表(TWSTRS)时的评分者间信度]
Brain Nerve. 2009 Jan;61(1):65-71.
10
Improved method of reporting disability grades in POD programmes.POD项目中残疾等级报告的改进方法。
Lepr Rev. 1999 Jun;70(2):212-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Social Determinants of Health and Disability Scores in Leprosy-Affected Persons in Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.印度泰米尔纳德邦塞勒姆地区麻风病患者健康和残疾评分的社会决定因素分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 6;15(12):2769. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122769.
2
Anti-sarcopenic effects of diamino-diphenyl sulfone observed in elderly female leprosy survivors: a cross-sectional study.老年女性麻风病幸存者中观察到的二氨基二苯砜的抗肌肉减少症作用:一项横断面研究。
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016 Jun;7(3):322-9. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12074. Epub 2015 Oct 15.