Melling Mahmoud, Karimian-Teherani Daniela, Mostler Sascha, Behnam Mark, Hochmeister Sonja
First Department of Anatomy, University of Vienna, A-1170 Vienna, Austria.
Microsc Res Tech. 2004 May 1;64(1):1-9. doi: 10.1002/jemt.20045.
A comparative study of atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging of the healthy human liver parenchyma was carried out to determine the similarities and the differences. In this study, we compared the fine hepatic structures as observed by SEM and AFM. Although AFM revealed such typical hepatic structures as bile canaliculi and hepatocytes, it also showed the location of the nucleus and chromatin granules in rough relief structure, which was not visible by SEM. By contrast, SEM visualized other structures, such as microvilli, the central vein, and collagenous fibers, none of which was visualized by AFM. For better orientation and confirmation of most of the structures imaged by SEM and AFM, Congo Red-stained specimens were also examined. Amyloid deposits in the Disse's spaces were shown especially clearly in these images. The differences between the SEM and AFM images reflected the characteristics of the detection systems and methods used for sample preparation. Our results reveal that more detailed information on hepatic morphology is obtained by exploiting the advantages of both SEM and AFM.
开展了一项关于健康人肝脏实质的原子力显微镜(AFM)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)成像的比较研究,以确定两者的异同。在本研究中,我们比较了通过SEM和AFM观察到的精细肝脏结构。虽然AFM揭示了胆小管和肝细胞等典型的肝脏结构,但它还显示了细胞核和染色质颗粒在粗糙浮雕结构中的位置,这是SEM无法看到的。相比之下,SEM使其他结构可视化,如微绒毛、中央静脉和胶原纤维,这些结构AFM均无法可视化。为了更好地定位和确认SEM和AFM成像的大多数结构,还检查了刚果红染色的标本。在这些图像中,狄氏间隙中的淀粉样沉积物显示得特别清楚。SEM和AFM图像之间的差异反映了用于样品制备的检测系统和方法的特点。我们的结果表明,通过利用SEM和AFM两者的优势,可以获得关于肝脏形态更详细的信息。