Suppr超能文献

老年抑郁症患者中选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与三环类抗抑郁药副作用的比较:一项荟萃分析。

A comparison of side effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants in older depressed patients: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wilson Kenneth, Mottram Pat

机构信息

University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004 Aug;19(8):754-62. doi: 10.1002/gps.1156.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relative tolerability and side effect profile of tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in older depressed people.

METHODS

A systematic literature search generated 37 randomised controlled trials of TCAs and SSRIs of which 11 were entered into a meta analysis comparing withdrawal rates and side effect profiles.

RESULTS

537 TCA recipients and 554 SSRI recipients were compared. TCAs had an increased withdrawal rate (RR: 0.24, CI 1.04, 1.47). A similar result was found when comparing classical TCAs (451 patients) (amitriptyline, clomipramine, doxepin and dothiepin) with SSRIs (466 patients) (RR 1.30 CI: 1.02,1.64). These findings were reflected in the increased TCA prevalence of side effects including dry mouth, drowsiness, dizziness and lethargy. No differences were found when comparing TCA related drugs (mianserin and trazadone) with SSRIs (RR 1.07 CI 0.43, 2.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the relative low prevalence of side effects associated with SSRIs a significant minority of older people find these drugs intolerable and experience nausea, vomiting, dizziness and drowsiness. We conclude that TCA related drugs are comparable to SSRIs in terms of tolerability and may offer an alternative when SSRIs are either contra-indicated or clinically unacceptable.

摘要

目的

探讨三环类抗抑郁药和选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂在老年抑郁症患者中的相对耐受性及副作用情况。

方法

通过系统文献检索,获得了37项关于三环类抗抑郁药和选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的随机对照试验,其中11项纳入荟萃分析,比较撤药率和副作用情况。

结果

比较了537名接受三环类抗抑郁药治疗者和554名接受选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗者。三环类抗抑郁药的撤药率更高(相对危险度:0.24,可信区间1.04,1.47)。在比较经典三环类抗抑郁药(451例患者)(阿米替林、氯米帕明、多塞平和度硫平)与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(466例患者)时也发现了类似结果(相对危险度1.30,可信区间:1.02,1.64)。这些结果反映在三环类抗抑郁药副作用发生率增加,包括口干、嗜睡、头晕和乏力。在比较三环类相关药物(米安色林和曲唑酮)与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂时未发现差异(相对危险度1.07,可信区间0.43,2.70)。

结论

尽管选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂相关副作用的发生率相对较低,但仍有相当一部分老年人觉得这些药物无法耐受,会出现恶心、呕吐、头晕和嗜睡等症状。我们得出结论,三环类相关药物在耐受性方面与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂相当,当选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂禁忌或临床上不可接受时,可作为一种替代选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验