文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

撤回:选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)与三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)停药情况对比

WITHDRAWN: Treatment discontinuation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) versus tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs).

作者信息

Barbui C, Hotopf M, Freemantle N, Boynton J, Churchill R, Eccles M P, Geddes J R, Hardy R, Lewis G, Mason J M

机构信息

University of Verona, Department of Medicine and Public Health, Section of Psychiatry, Ospedale Policlinico, 37134 Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD002791. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002791.pub2.


DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD002791.pub2
PMID:17636706
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are thought to have better discontinuation rates (i.e. less people dropping out) than tricyclic and heterocyclic antidepressant drugs. It is important to quantify the drop-out rates of different antidepressant drugs in order to have a better understanding of the relative tolerability of these drugs. OBJECTIVES: To assess the comparative tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic/heterocyclic antidepressant drugs. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Controlled Trials Registers (1997 to 1999), MEDLINE (1966 to 1999), EMBASE (1974 to 1999) We also searched specialist journals, the reference lists of relevant papers and previous systematic reviews, conference abstracts and government documents. Representatives of the pharmaceutical industry were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Parallel group randomised controlled trials comparing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with tricyclic or heterocyclic antidepressants in people with depression. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and a third reviewer checked any cases of disagreement. MAIN RESULTS: We included 136 trials. The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors showed less participants dropping out compared to the tricyclic/heterocyclic group (odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.30). A statistically significant difference was found in total drop-outs between the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the old tricyclics as well as the newer tricyclics. When the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were compared to the heterocyclic antidepressants, there was a non significant difference favouring the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The poor tolerability profile of the old tricyclics was explained by differences in drop-outs for side-effects, but not for inefficacy. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Whilst selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors do appear to show an advantage over tricyclic drugs in terms of total drop-outs, this advantage is relatively modest. This has implications for pharmaco-economic models, some of which may have overestimated the difference of drop-out rates between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants. These results are based on short-term randomised controlled trials, and may not generalise into clinical practice.

摘要

背景:人们认为选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的停药率(即退出研究的人数较少)优于三环类和杂环类抗抑郁药物。为了更好地了解这些药物的相对耐受性,量化不同抗抑郁药物的退出率很重要。 目的:评估选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与三环类/杂环类抗抑郁药物的相对耐受性。 检索策略:我们检索了Cochrane协作网抑郁、焦虑和神经症对照试验注册库(1997年至1999年)、MEDLINE(1966年至1999年)、EMBASE(1974年至1999年)。我们还检索了专业期刊、相关论文的参考文献列表以及先前的系统评价、会议摘要和政府文件。我们联系了制药行业的代表。 入选标准:比较选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与三环类或杂环类抗抑郁药物治疗抑郁症患者的平行组随机对照试验。 数据收集与分析:两名评价员独立提取数据,第三名评价员检查存在分歧的任何情况。 主要结果:我们纳入了136项试验。与三环类/杂环类药物组相比,选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂组退出研究的参与者较少(优势比1.21,95%置信区间1.12至1.30)。在选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与老三环类药物以及新三环类药物之间,总退出率存在统计学显著差异。当将选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与杂环类抗抑郁药物进行比较时,有利于选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的差异无统计学意义。老三环类药物耐受性差是由因副作用导致的退出差异引起的,而非疗效不佳。 作者结论:虽然选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂在总退出率方面似乎确实比三环类药物具有优势,但这种优势相对较小。这对药物经济学模型有影响,其中一些模型可能高估了选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与三环类抗抑郁药物之间退出率的差异。这些结果基于短期随机对照试验,可能无法推广到临床实践中。

相似文献

[1]
WITHDRAWN: Treatment discontinuation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) versus tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs).

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007-7-18

[2]
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic and heterocyclic antidepressants: comparison of drug adherence.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000

[3]
Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-10-19

[4]
Amitriptyline versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003

[5]
Antidepressants versus placebo for panic disorder in adults.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-4-5

[6]
Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people with cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-4-23

[7]
Antidepressants for depression in adults with HIV infection.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-1-22

[8]
Amitriptyline for depression.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007-7-18

[9]
Antidepressants for depressed elderly.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006-1-25

[10]
Antidepressants for insomnia in adults.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-5-14

引用本文的文献

[1]
Influence of Zhigancao decoction on chronic heart failure combined with depression.

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025-4-14

[2]
Repeated Yueju, But Not Fluoxetine, Induced Sustained Antidepressant Activity in a Mouse Model of Chronic Learned Helplessness: Involvement of CaMKII Signaling in the Hippocampus.

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022-2-24

[3]
[Tricyclic antidepressants for initial treatment of depressive episodes? Con].

Nervenarzt. 2016-5

[4]
Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial of the Efficacy of Venlafaxine Versus Citalopram in the Treatment of the Acute Phase of Major Depressive Disorder.

Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2015-6

[5]
Ketamine as antidepressant? Current state and future perspectives.

Curr Neuropharmacol. 2014-1

[6]
Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011-12-7

[7]
Slow versus standard up-titration of paroxetine for the treatment of depression in cancer patients: a pilot study.

Support Care Cancer. 2011-3-15

[8]
Effectiveness of antidepressants: an evidence myth constructed from a thousand randomized trials?

Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2008-5-27

[9]
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

BMJ. 2003-9-6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索