• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

撤回:选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)与三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)停药情况对比

WITHDRAWN: Treatment discontinuation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) versus tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs).

作者信息

Barbui C, Hotopf M, Freemantle N, Boynton J, Churchill R, Eccles M P, Geddes J R, Hardy R, Lewis G, Mason J M

机构信息

University of Verona, Department of Medicine and Public Health, Section of Psychiatry, Ospedale Policlinico, 37134 Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD002791. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002791.pub2.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD002791.pub2
PMID:17636706
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are thought to have better discontinuation rates (i.e. less people dropping out) than tricyclic and heterocyclic antidepressant drugs. It is important to quantify the drop-out rates of different antidepressant drugs in order to have a better understanding of the relative tolerability of these drugs.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic/heterocyclic antidepressant drugs.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Controlled Trials Registers (1997 to 1999), MEDLINE (1966 to 1999), EMBASE (1974 to 1999) We also searched specialist journals, the reference lists of relevant papers and previous systematic reviews, conference abstracts and government documents. Representatives of the pharmaceutical industry were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Parallel group randomised controlled trials comparing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with tricyclic or heterocyclic antidepressants in people with depression.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data and a third reviewer checked any cases of disagreement.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 136 trials. The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors showed less participants dropping out compared to the tricyclic/heterocyclic group (odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.30). A statistically significant difference was found in total drop-outs between the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the old tricyclics as well as the newer tricyclics. When the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were compared to the heterocyclic antidepressants, there was a non significant difference favouring the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The poor tolerability profile of the old tricyclics was explained by differences in drop-outs for side-effects, but not for inefficacy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Whilst selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors do appear to show an advantage over tricyclic drugs in terms of total drop-outs, this advantage is relatively modest. This has implications for pharmaco-economic models, some of which may have overestimated the difference of drop-out rates between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants. These results are based on short-term randomised controlled trials, and may not generalise into clinical practice.

摘要

背景

人们认为选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的停药率(即退出研究的人数较少)优于三环类和杂环类抗抑郁药物。为了更好地了解这些药物的相对耐受性,量化不同抗抑郁药物的退出率很重要。

目的

评估选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与三环类/杂环类抗抑郁药物的相对耐受性。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane协作网抑郁、焦虑和神经症对照试验注册库(1997年至1999年)、MEDLINE(1966年至1999年)、EMBASE(1974年至1999年)。我们还检索了专业期刊、相关论文的参考文献列表以及先前的系统评价、会议摘要和政府文件。我们联系了制药行业的代表。

入选标准

比较选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与三环类或杂环类抗抑郁药物治疗抑郁症患者的平行组随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

两名评价员独立提取数据,第三名评价员检查存在分歧的任何情况。

主要结果

我们纳入了136项试验。与三环类/杂环类药物组相比,选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂组退出研究的参与者较少(优势比1.21,95%置信区间1.12至1.30)。在选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与老三环类药物以及新三环类药物之间,总退出率存在统计学显著差异。当将选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与杂环类抗抑郁药物进行比较时,有利于选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的差异无统计学意义。老三环类药物耐受性差是由因副作用导致的退出差异引起的,而非疗效不佳。

作者结论

虽然选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂在总退出率方面似乎确实比三环类药物具有优势,但这种优势相对较小。这对药物经济学模型有影响,其中一些模型可能高估了选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与三环类抗抑郁药物之间退出率的差异。这些结果基于短期随机对照试验,可能无法推广到临床实践中。

相似文献

1
WITHDRAWN: Treatment discontinuation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) versus tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs).撤回:选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)与三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)停药情况对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD002791. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002791.pub2.
2
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic and heterocyclic antidepressants: comparison of drug adherence.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与三环类及杂环类抗抑郁药:药物依从性比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(4):CD002791. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002791.
3
Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.氟西汀与其他类型抗抑郁药物治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub2.
4
Amitriptyline versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.阿米替林与其他类型抗抑郁药物治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD004186. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004186.
5
Antidepressants versus placebo for panic disorder in adults.成人惊恐障碍患者使用抗抑郁药与安慰剂的对照研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 5;4(4):CD010676. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010676.pub2.
6
Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people with cancer.用于治疗癌症患者抑郁症的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 23;4(4):CD011006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011006.pub3.
7
Antidepressants for depression in adults with HIV infection.用于感染HIV的成年抑郁症患者的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD008525. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008525.pub3.
8
Amitriptyline for depression.用于治疗抑郁症的阿米替林。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD004186. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004186.pub2.
9
Antidepressants for depressed elderly.用于老年抑郁症患者的抗抑郁药
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;2006(1):CD003491. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003491.pub2.
10
Antidepressants for insomnia in adults.用于治疗成人失眠的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 14;5(5):CD010753. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010753.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Zhigancao decoction on chronic heart failure combined with depression.炙甘草汤对慢性心力衰竭合并抑郁症的影响。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Apr 14;12:1538940. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1538940. eCollection 2025.
2
Repeated Yueju, But Not Fluoxetine, Induced Sustained Antidepressant Activity in a Mouse Model of Chronic Learned Helplessness: Involvement of CaMKII Signaling in the Hippocampus.重复给予越鞠丸,但氟西汀未出现此现象,在慢性习得性无助小鼠模型中诱导出持续的抗抑郁活性:海马体中CaMKII信号通路的参与。
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Feb 24;2022:1442578. doi: 10.1155/2022/1442578. eCollection 2022.
3
[Tricyclic antidepressants for initial treatment of depressive episodes? Con].
三环类抗抑郁药用于抑郁发作的初始治疗?[结论]
Nervenarzt. 2016 May;87(5):561-2. doi: 10.1007/s00115-015-0032-6.
4
Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial of the Efficacy of Venlafaxine Versus Citalopram in the Treatment of the Acute Phase of Major Depressive Disorder.文拉法辛与西酞普兰治疗重度抑郁症急性期疗效的双盲随机临床试验
Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2015 Jun;9(2):e1041. doi: 10.17795/ijpbs1041. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
5
Ketamine as antidepressant? Current state and future perspectives.氯胺酮作为抗抑郁药?现状与未来展望。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2014 Jan;12(1):57-70. doi: 10.2174/1570159X113119990043.
6
Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression.米氮平与其他抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD006528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006528.pub2.
7
Slow versus standard up-titration of paroxetine for the treatment of depression in cancer patients: a pilot study.帕罗西汀缓慢滴定与标准滴定治疗癌症患者抑郁症的疗效比较:一项初步研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Feb;20(2):375-84. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1118-8. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
8
Effectiveness of antidepressants: an evidence myth constructed from a thousand randomized trials?抗抑郁药的有效性:一个由一千项随机试验构建的证据神话?
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2008 May 27;3:14. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-3-14.
9
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.评估荟萃分析中的异质性
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.