Medway F J, Smircic J M
University of South Carolina, Columbia 29208.
Psychol Rep. 1992 Aug;71(1):65-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1992.71.1.65.
Administrators of 221 South Carolina public elementary and middle schools were surveyed regarding behaviors appropriate for corporal punishment. Analysis indicated that aggressive acts by students, both mild and severe, were rated appropriate for corporal punishment, and these were not typically seen as appropriate for a psychologist's intervention. Rather, psychologists were seen as useful for character problems such as lying, cheating, and tantrums.
对南卡罗来纳州221所公立中小学的管理人员进行了调查,询问适合体罚的行为。分析表明,学生的攻击性行为,无论是轻微的还是严重的,都被认为适合体罚,而这些行为通常不被视为适合心理学家进行干预。相反,心理学家被认为对诸如说谎、作弊和发脾气等性格问题有用。