Imitola Jaime, Park Kook In, Teng Yang D, Nisim Sahar, Lachyankar Mahesh, Ourednik Jitka, Mueller Franz-Josef, Yiou Rene, Atala Anthony, Sidman Richard L, Tuszynski Mark, Khoury Samia J, Snyder Evan Y
Center for Neurologic Diseases, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA4 02115, USA.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 May 29;359(1445):823-37. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1474.
The thesis advanced in this essay is that stem cells-particularly those in the nervous system-are components in a series of inborn 'programs' that not only ensure normal development, but persist throughout life so as to maintain homeostasis in the face of perturbations-both small and great. These programs encode what has come to be called 'plasticity'. The stem cell is one of the repositories of this plasticity. This review examines the evidence that interaction between the neural stem cell (as a prototypical somatic stem cell) and the developing or injured brain is a dynamic, complex, ongoing reciprocal set of interactions where both entities are constantly in flux. We suggest that this interaction can be viewed almost from a 'systems biology' vantage point. We further advance the notion that clones of exogenous stem cells in transplantation paradigms may not only be viewed for their therapeutic potential, but also as biological tools for 'interrogating' the normal or abnormal central nervous system environment, indicating what salient cues (among the many present) are actually guiding the expression of these 'programs'; in other words, using the stem cell as a 'reporter cell'. Based on this type of analysis, we suggest some of the relevant molecular pathways responsible for this 'cross-talk' which, in turn, lead to proliferation, migration, cell genesis, trophic support, protection, guidance, detoxification, rescue, etc. This type of developmental insight, we propose, is required for the development of therapeutic strategies for neurodegenerative disease and other nervous system afflictions in humans. Understanding the relevant molecular pathways of stem cell repair phenotype should be a priority, in our view, for the entire stem cell field.
本文提出的论点是,干细胞——尤其是神经系统中的干细胞——是一系列先天“程序”的组成部分,这些程序不仅确保正常发育,而且在整个生命过程中持续存在,以便在面对大小扰动时维持体内平衡。这些程序编码了后来被称为“可塑性”的东西。干细胞是这种可塑性的储存库之一。本综述考察了神经干细胞(作为典型的体细胞干细胞)与发育中的或受损的大脑之间的相互作用是动态、复杂且持续的相互作用这一证据,在这种相互作用中,两个实体都在不断变化。我们认为,这种相互作用几乎可以从“系统生物学”的角度来看待。我们进一步提出,移植范例中外源干细胞的克隆不仅可以因其治疗潜力而被看待,还可以作为“探究”正常或异常中枢神经系统环境的生物学工具,指出(众多存在的线索中)哪些显著线索实际上在引导这些“程序”的表达;换句话说,将干细胞用作“报告细胞”。基于这种分析类型,我们提出了一些负责这种“相互作用”的相关分子途径,这些途径进而导致增殖、迁移、细胞生成、营养支持、保护、引导、解毒、救援等。我们认为,这种发育方面的见解对于人类神经退行性疾病和其他神经系统疾病治疗策略的开发是必需的。在我们看来,了解干细胞修复表型的相关分子途径应该是整个干细胞领域的优先事项。