Peelen Marius V, Downing Paul E
School of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Wales, Bangor, United Kingdom LL57 2AS.
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jan;93(1):603-8. doi: 10.1152/jn.00513.2004. Epub 2004 Aug 4.
Functional neuroimaging studies have revealed human brain regions, notably in the fusiform gyrus, that respond selectively to images of faces as opposed to other kinds of objects. Here we use fMRI to show that the mid-fusiform gyrus responds with nearly the same level of selectivity to images of human bodies without faces, relative to tools and scenes. In a group-average analysis (n = 22), the fusiform activations identified by contrasting faces versus tools and bodies versus tools are very similar. Analyses of within-subjects regions of interest, however, show that the peaks of the two activations occupy close but distinct locations. In a second experiment, we find that the body-selective fusiform region, but not the face-selective region, responds more to stick figure depictions of bodies than to scrambled controls. This result further distinguishes the two foci and confirms that the body-selective response generalizes to abstract image formats. These results challenge accounts of the mid-fusiform gyrus that focus solely on faces and suggest that this region contains multiple distinct category-selective neural representations.
功能性神经成像研究揭示了人类大脑中的一些区域,尤其是梭状回,它们对面部图像有选择性反应,而对其他类型的物体则不然。在这里,我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来表明,相对于工具和场景,梭状回中部对无面部的人体图像的反应具有几乎相同的选择性水平。在一项群体平均分析(n = 22)中,通过对比面部与工具以及身体与工具所确定的梭状回激活情况非常相似。然而,对个体受试者感兴趣区域的分析表明,这两种激活的峰值占据了相近但不同的位置。在第二个实验中,我们发现身体选择性梭状回区域,而非面部选择性区域,对身体的简笔画描绘比对打乱的对照图像反应更强烈。这一结果进一步区分了这两个焦点,并证实身体选择性反应可推广到抽象图像格式。这些结果对仅关注面部的梭状回中部的观点提出了挑战,并表明该区域包含多个不同的类别选择性神经表征。