Pickett William, Simpson Kelly, Brison Robert J
Department of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Chronic Dis Can. 2004 Winter;25(1):32-41.
Contemporary studies of blunt head trauma and its determinants are important for prevention. It is also important to understand the strengths and limitations of the common sources of data used for the ongoing study of these injuries. Using the Ontario Trauma Registry, we described frequent patterns of blunt head trauma and identified priorities for prevention and research. A review of methodological issues that arose during the analysis of these trauma registry data is also provided. Blunt head trauma cases were identified within two data sets of the Ontario Trauma Registry. The Minimal Data Set is population-based and contains acute care injury hospitalizations, and the Comprehensive Data Set contains "major injuries" treated at a lead trauma hospital. Injury control priorities varied by age group, sex and data set and these are profiled in the manuscript. The results indicate the importance of examining multiple sources of surveillance data in establishing injury control priorities. The methodological review demonstrated the need to critically examine the completeness and accuracy of trauma registry data in arriving at decisions about priorities.
当代关于钝性头部创伤及其决定因素的研究对于预防工作具有重要意义。了解用于这些损伤持续研究的常见数据来源的优势和局限性也很重要。利用安大略创伤登记处的数据,我们描述了钝性头部创伤的常见模式,并确定了预防和研究的重点。本文还对这些创伤登记数据在分析过程中出现的方法学问题进行了综述。在安大略创伤登记处的两个数据集中确定了钝性头部创伤病例。最小数据集基于人群,包含急性护理损伤住院病例,综合数据集包含在主要创伤医院接受治疗的“重伤”病例。伤害控制重点因年龄组、性别和数据集而异,本文对此进行了概述。结果表明,在确定伤害控制重点时,检查多个监测数据来源非常重要。方法学综述表明,在做出重点决策时,需要严格审查创伤登记数据的完整性和准确性。