Perschbacher James M, Reeder Guy S, Jacobsen Steven J, Weston Susan A, Killian Jill M, Slobodova Adriana, Roger Véronique L
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn 55905, USA.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2004 Aug;79(8):983-91. doi: 10.4065/79.8.983.
To examine secular trends in the use of evidence-based therapies in a geographically defined cohort of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and to test the hypotheses that baseline use is increasing and that disparities in use are diminishing,
All consecutively hospitalized patients who were dismissed from Olmsted County, Minnesota, hospitals between 1979 and 1998 with a diagnosis of MI were identified using standardized criteria (biomarkers, cardiac pain, and electrocardiography). The entire community medical record, available via the Rochester Epidemiology Project, was reviewed to ascertain baseline characteristics including comorbidity, presence of ST-segment elevation on electrocardiography, and treatment. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association of treatment with age and sex, independent of other baseline characteristics.
Between 1979 and 1998, 2317 incident MIs (patient mean +/- SD age, 67+/-14 years; 43% women; 57% aged > or = 65 years) occurred in Olmsted County. The use of all evidence-based therapies increased over time, primarily reflecting the introduction of these medications at the time of Index MI. Between 1989 and 1998, age was not independently associated with use of aspirin or ACE inhibitors. Disparities in use persisted for reperfusion therapy and beta-blockers. Reperfusion therapy or revascularization was used less frequently in older persons, particularly in elderly women (P<.001). Use of beta-blockers decreased 16% among persons aged 65 years or older, independent of measurable differences in baseline characteristics and MI severity (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.93).
The use of all evidence-based therapies for MI increased markedly over time; however, residual gaps in use were noted. Reperfusion therapy or revascularization is used less frequently in women and elderly persons, and beta-blockers are used less frequently in elderly persons. These differences are not explained by measurable differences in baseline characteristics. Women and elderly persons represent an increasing proportion of patients with MIs in the community; therefore, these findings define therapeutic opportunities.
研究在一个地理区域界定的心肌梗死(MI)患者队列中基于证据的治疗方法使用情况的长期趋势,并检验以下假设:基线使用情况正在增加,且使用差异正在缩小。
利用标准化标准(生物标志物、胸痛和心电图)确定了1979年至1998年间在明尼苏达州奥尔姆斯特德县医院出院的所有连续住院且诊断为MI的患者。通过罗切斯特流行病学项目获取整个社区的病历,以确定基线特征,包括合并症、心电图上ST段抬高的情况以及治疗情况。使用逻辑回归模型来检验治疗与年龄和性别的关联,不受其他基线特征的影响。
1979年至1998年间,奥尔姆斯特德县发生了2317例首次发生的MI(患者平均年龄±标准差为67±14岁;43%为女性;57%年龄≥65岁)。所有基于证据的治疗方法的使用随时间增加,主要反映了这些药物在首次发生MI时的引入。1989年至1998年间,年龄与阿司匹林或ACE抑制剂的使用无独立关联。再灌注治疗和β受体阻滞剂的使用差异依然存在。老年人,尤其是老年女性,再灌注治疗或血管重建术的使用频率较低(P<0.001)。65岁及以上人群中β受体阻滞剂的使用减少了16%,与基线特征和MI严重程度的可测量差异无关(风险比,0.84;95%置信区间,0.74 - 0.93)。
随着时间的推移,所有基于证据的MI治疗方法的使用显著增加;然而,仍存在使用差距。女性和老年人接受再灌注治疗或血管重建术的频率较低,老年人使用β受体阻滞剂的频率较低。这些差异无法通过基线特征的可测量差异来解释。女性和老年人在社区MI患者中所占比例不断增加;因此,这些发现明确了治疗机会。