Rudolph Katherine S, Snyder-Mackler Lynn
Department of Physical Therapy, 301 McKinly Laboratory, University of Delaware, Newmark, DE 19716, USA.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004 Oct;14(5):565-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2004.03.002.
Stair ascent and descent requires large knee motions and muscle forces that can be challenging for people with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency. Movement and muscle activity patterns were compared in two groups of ACL deficient subjects and a group of uninjured subjects. The ACL deficient subjects were prospectively classified according to functional ability. "Copers" were defined as individuals with complete ACL rupture and no symptoms of knee instability and participated in high-level sports without difficulty. "Non-copers" were defined as ACL deficient individuals who had instability with low-level daily activities and were not able to participate in sports. Sagittal plane kinematic and kinetic data from the hip, knee and ankle and electromyographic data from the vastus lateralis, lateral hamstring, medial gastrocnemius, and soleus were collected as subjects stepped up and over a 26 cm high step. Both coper and non-coper subjects had altered movement patterns as they controlled the rapid movement from step ascent to descent with their involved limbs. Only non-copers used significantly different movement patterns on their involved limb compared to controls after they had descended from the step and their involved side accepted the weight of the body. Classifying subjects by functional ability resulted in more pronounced differences in movement patterns between non-copers and copers. Copers moved more like uninjured subjects.
上下楼梯需要大幅度的膝关节活动和肌肉力量,这对于前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤的人来说可能具有挑战性。在两组ACL损伤受试者和一组未受伤受试者中比较了运动和肌肉活动模式。根据功能能力对ACL损伤受试者进行前瞻性分类。“应对者”定义为ACL完全断裂且无膝关节不稳定症状、能够毫无困难地参加高水平运动的个体。“非应对者”定义为在低水平日常活动中出现不稳定且无法参加运动的ACL损伤个体。当受试者踏上并跨过一个26厘米高的台阶时,收集了髋、膝和踝关节的矢状面运动学和动力学数据,以及股外侧肌、股二头肌外侧头、腓肠肌内侧头和比目鱼肌的肌电图数据。在通过患侧肢体控制从踏上台阶到下台阶的快速动作时,应对者和非应对者的运动模式均发生了改变。在下台阶后,当患侧肢体承受身体重量时,只有非应对者与对照组相比在患侧肢体上使用了明显不同的运动模式。根据功能能力对受试者进行分类,导致非应对者和应对者之间的运动模式差异更加明显。应对者的运动方式更类似于未受伤的受试者。