Blasimann Angela, Koenig Irene, Baert Isabel, Baur Heiner, Vissers Dirk
Department of Health Professions, Division of Physiotherapy, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Murtenstrasse 10, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2021 Nov 8;13(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13102-021-00370-5.
Adequate neuromuscular control of the knee could be one element to prevent secondary injuries after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. To assess neuromuscular control in terms of time, amplitude and activity, electromyography (EMG) is used. However, it is unclear which assessments using EMG could be used for a safe return to sports (RTS). Therefore, we aimed to summarize EMG-related assessments for neuromuscular control of the knee in adult patients after an ACL injury to decide upon readiness for RTS.
This systematic review followed guidelines of Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane recommendations. MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), SPORTDiscus and the Web of Science were searched from inception to March 2019 and updated in November 2020. Studies identifying electromyographic assessments for neuromuscular control during dynamic tasks in adult, physically active patients with an anterior cruciate ligament injury were eligible and qualitatively synthesized. Two independent reviewers used a modified Downs and Black checklist to assess risk of bias of included studies.
From initially 1388 hits, 38 mainly cross-sectional, case-controlled studies were included for qualitative analysis. Most studies provided EMG outcomes of thigh muscles during jumping, running or squatting. Outcomes measures described neuromuscular control of the knee in domains of time, amplitude or activity. Risk of bias was medium to high due to an unclear description of participants and prior interventions, confounding factors and incompletely reported results.
Despite a wide range of EMG outcome measures for neuromuscular control, none was used to decide upon return to sports in these patients. Additional studies are needed to define readiness towards RTS by assessing neuromuscular control in adult ACL patients with EMG. Further research should aim at finding reliable and valid, EMG-related variables to be used as diagnostic tool for neuromuscular control. Moreover, future studies should aim at more homogenous groups including adequately matched healthy subjects, evaluate gender separately and use sport-specific tasks. Registration The protocol for this systematic review was indexed beforehand in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) and registered as CRD42019122188.
对膝关节进行充分的神经肌肉控制可能是预防前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤后继发性损伤的一个因素。为了从时间、幅度和活动方面评估神经肌肉控制情况,人们使用了肌电图(EMG)。然而,目前尚不清楚哪些使用EMG的评估可用于安全恢复运动(RTS)。因此,我们旨在总结ACL损伤成年患者膝关节神经肌肉控制的EMG相关评估,以确定其是否准备好恢复运动。
本系统评价遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南及Cochrane推荐意见。检索了MEDLINE/PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆、物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)、SPORTDiscus和科学网,检索时间从建库至2019年3月,并于2020年11月更新。纳入在有身体活动的成年前交叉韧带损伤患者动态任务期间进行神经肌肉控制的肌电图评估研究,并进行定性综合分析。两名独立评审员使用改良的唐斯和布莱克清单评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。
从最初的1388条记录中,纳入了38项主要为横断面、病例对照研究进行定性分析。大多数研究提供了跳跃、跑步或深蹲时大腿肌肉的EMG结果。结果测量描述了膝关节在时间、幅度或活动方面的神经肌肉控制情况。由于对参与者和既往干预措施的描述不明确、存在混杂因素以及结果报告不完整,偏倚风险为中到高。
尽管有多种用于神经肌肉控制的EMG结果测量方法,但在这些患者中没有一种被用于决定是否恢复运动。需要更多研究通过评估成年ACL患者的神经肌肉控制情况来确定其恢复运动的准备情况。进一步的研究应旨在找到可靠且有效的EMG相关变量,用作神经肌肉控制的诊断工具。此外,未来的研究应针对更同质的群体,包括匹配充分的健康受试者,分别评估性别,并使用特定运动任务。注册 本系统评价的方案预先在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)中进行了索引,并注册为CRD42019122188。