Kayser Christoph, Körding Konrad P, König Peter
Institute of Neuroinformatics, University/ETH Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004 Aug;14(4):468-73. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2004.06.002.
A major part of vision research builds on the assumption that processing of visual stimuli can be understood on the basis of knowledge about the processing of simplified, artificial stimuli. Recent experimental advances, however, show that a combination of responses to simplified stimuli does not adequately describe responses to natural visual scenes. The systems performance exceeds the performance predicted from understanding its basic constituents. This highlights the fact that the visual system is specifically adapted to the properties of its everyday input and can only fully be understood when probed with naturalistic stimuli.
视觉研究的一个主要部分基于这样一种假设,即视觉刺激的处理可以基于对简化的人工刺激处理的了解来理解。然而,最近的实验进展表明,对简化刺激的反应组合并不能充分描述对自然视觉场景的反应。该系统的性能超过了通过了解其基本组成部分所预测的性能。这突出了一个事实,即视觉系统特别适应其日常输入的特性,只有在使用自然主义刺激进行探测时才能被充分理解。