Singer Richard B
J Insur Med. 2002;34(1):3-11.
The objective of this article is to present results from the latest of 3 recent reports from the Cleveland Clinic on excess mortality associated with abnormal delay in the recovery of an elevated pulse rate produced in a treadmill exercise test. This is done in the context of a long-standing medical interest in this phenomenon and its prognostic significance (see Comment section).
Delay in return of the pulse rate after exercise has long attracted medical interest as a potentially unfavorable prognostic factor. However, this has not become a factor in the interpretation of the treadmill exercise test. Cardiologist staff members of the Cleveland Clinic have recently studied the mortality predictive effect of delay in pulse recovery in 3 different cohorts of patients given a treadmill exercise test (modified Bruce protocol). The newest, largest and most complete of these studies is the source article for this report.
This was an observational follow-up (FU) study with a median of 5.2 years (range 1.4-8.7 years). The patients were categorized as abnormal pulse recovery at 1 minute after peak exercise with decrease of only 12 beats per minute or less, and normal if >12 beats per minute. These classes were combined with dichotomous classes according to the exercise test result and with other associated risk factors.
A good approximation of exposure was achieved for each of the 4 pulse recovery/exercise test groups. From numerical data in the article, it was possible to derive aggregate mean annual mortality rates for these groups and selected combinations of pulse recovery with other risk factors. Mortality was lowest (2.8 per 1000) in the group with pulse recovery and exercise test both normal (66% of the total patients screened), and this was used as the "expected" rate, without adjustment for any differences in age. On this basis the excess death rate (EDR) was about 7 per 1000 per year when either pulse recovery or exercise test was abnormal, and 28 per 1000 when both were abnormal. Similar levels of EDR were found in the combinations of pulse recovery with other risk factors.
Abnormal pulse recovery after the treadmill exercise test is a powerful and independent predictor of significant excess mortality.
本文的目的是展示克利夫兰诊所最近3份报告中最新一份的结果,该报告涉及在跑步机运动试验中产生的脉搏率升高恢复异常延迟与超额死亡率的关系。这是在长期以来医学界对这一现象及其预后意义感兴趣的背景下进行的(见评论部分)。
运动后脉搏率恢复延迟长期以来一直引起医学界的关注,被视为一个潜在的不良预后因素。然而,这尚未成为跑步机运动试验解读中的一个因素。克利夫兰诊所的心脏病专家工作人员最近在3组接受跑步机运动试验(改良布鲁斯方案)的不同患者队列中研究了脉搏恢复延迟的死亡率预测作用。这些研究中最新、规模最大且最完整的是本报告的源文章。
这是一项观察性随访(FU)研究,中位随访时间为5.2年(范围1.4 - 8.7年)。患者被分类为运动峰值后1分钟脉搏恢复异常(每分钟仅下降12次或更少),若每分钟下降超过12次则为正常。这些类别与根据运动试验结果划分的二分类别以及其他相关风险因素相结合。
4个脉搏恢复/运动试验组中的每一组都实现了对暴露情况的良好近似。从文章中的数值数据可以得出这些组以及脉搏恢复与其他风险因素的选定组合的总体年均死亡率。脉搏恢复和运动试验均正常的组(占筛查患者总数的66%)死亡率最低(每1000人中有2.8人),这被用作“预期”率,未对年龄差异进行任何调整。在此基础上,当脉搏恢复或运动试验异常时,超额死亡率(EDR)约为每年每1000人中有7人,当两者都异常时为每1000人中有28人。在脉搏恢复与其他风险因素的组合中也发现了类似水平的EDR。
跑步机运动试验后脉搏恢复异常是显著超额死亡率的有力且独立的预测指标。