Suppr超能文献

探索抑郁、躯体化、分离和述情障碍之间的关系——重叠还是独立的结构?

Exploring the relations between depression, somatization, dissociation and alexithymia--overlapping or independent constructs?

作者信息

Lipsanen Tapio, Saarijärvi Simo, Lauerma Hannu

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Psychopathology. 2004 Jul-Aug;37(4):200-6. doi: 10.1159/000080132. Epub 2004 Aug 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to extend our knowledge of associations among the constructs of alexithymia, depression, somatization and dissociation.

SAMPLING AND METHODS

924 nonclinical subjects answered questions about depression (21-item Beck Depression Inventory), somatization (13-item somatization part of Symptom Check List-90), dissociation (28-item Dissociative Experiences Scale) and alexithymia (20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale). In addition, a 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) was administered to detect psychiatric distress among subjects.

RESULTS

The results suggested that there was a significant clinical correlation between somatization, dissociation, depression and alexithymia (rho varied from 0.31 to 0.56). The principal component analysis revealed the presence of four components: depression, somatization, dissociation and alexithymia. The use of factor scores diminished the covariance between measures (rho varied from -0.10 to 0.01 between the factor scores). There was almost no correlation between the dissociation factor (rho = 0.06) and alexithymia factor (rho = 0.09) scores and general distress (GHQ-12).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that while somatization, dissociation, depression and alexithymia are distinct constructs, they correlate to a considerable extent. The use of factor analysis and factor scores should be considered to diminish covariance between the above constructs. Comparing results between factored and unfactored results may prove illuminating. As a case in point, the results suggest that the part of dissociation that coincides with other constructs (overlaps) is associated with distress, whereas the distinct part of dissociation (no shared covariance) is not associated with distress. The same applies to the alexithymia construct. Longitudinal studies are needed to show whether there is a trait such as a relatively stable dissociation component and also whether a separate state-dependent dissociation component exists that is associated with coincident distress, somatization and depression.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是拓展我们对述情障碍、抑郁、躯体化和分离性障碍各结构之间关联的认识。

抽样与方法

924名非临床受试者回答了关于抑郁(21项贝克抑郁量表)、躯体化(症状自评量表90中13项躯体化部分)、分离性障碍(28项分离体验量表)和述情障碍(20项多伦多述情障碍量表)的问题。此外,还使用了一份12项的一般健康问卷(GHQ - 12)来检测受试者的精神困扰情况。

结果

结果表明,躯体化、分离性障碍、抑郁和述情障碍之间存在显著的临床相关性(相关系数ρ从0.31到0.56不等)。主成分分析显示存在四个成分:抑郁、躯体化、分离性障碍和述情障碍。使用因子得分降低了各测量指标之间的协方差(因子得分之间的相关系数ρ从 - 0.10到0.01不等)。分离性障碍因子(ρ = 0.06)和述情障碍因子(ρ = 0.09)得分与一般困扰(GHQ - 12)之间几乎没有相关性。

结论

本研究表明,虽然躯体化、分离性障碍、抑郁和述情障碍是不同的结构,但它们在很大程度上相互关联。应考虑使用因子分析和因子得分来降低上述结构之间的协方差。比较因子分析结果和未进行因子分析的结果可能会有启发。例如,结果表明,与其他结构重合(重叠)的分离性障碍部分与困扰相关,而分离性障碍的独特部分(无共享协方差)与困扰无关。述情障碍结构也是如此。需要进行纵向研究来表明是否存在一种特质,如相对稳定的分离性障碍成分,以及是否存在与同时出现的困扰、躯体化和抑郁相关的单独的状态依赖性分离性障碍成分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验