van Zoest Wieske, Donk Mieke, Theeuwes Jan
Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Aug;30(4):746-59. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.749.
Four experiments were conducted to investigate the role of stimulus-driven control in saccadic eye movements. Participants were required to make a speeded saccade toward a predefined target presented concurrently with multiple nontargets and possibly 1 distractor. Target and distractor were either equally salient (Experiments 1 and 2) or not (Experiments 3 and 4). The results uniformly demonstrated that fast eye movements were completely stimulus driven, whereas slower eye movements were goal driven. These results are in line with neither a bottom-up account nor a top-down notion of visual selection. Instead, they indicate that visual selection is the outcome of 2 independent processes, one stimulus driven and the other goal driven, operating in different time windows.
进行了四项实验来研究刺激驱动控制在眼球快速运动中的作用。要求参与者快速向一个预定义目标进行扫视,该目标与多个非目标同时呈现,并且可能有1个干扰项。目标和干扰项要么同样显著(实验1和2),要么不同样显著(实验3和4)。结果一致表明,快速眼动完全由刺激驱动,而较慢的眼动则由目标驱动。这些结果既不符合自下而上的解释,也不符合自上而下的视觉选择概念。相反,它们表明视觉选择是两个独立过程的结果,一个由刺激驱动,另一个由目标驱动,在不同的时间窗口中起作用。