Nalbandian M M, Maldonado T S, Cushman J, Jacobowitz G J, Lamparello P J, Riles T S
Department of Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2004 Jul-Aug;38(4):375-9. doi: 10.1177/153857440403800411.
When peripheral vascular injuries present in conjunction with life threatening emergencies, controlling hemorrhage from a peripheral blood vessel may take initial priority, however, sacrificing a limb to preserve life is a well-established dictum. The use of intravascular shunts has allowed arterial and venous injuries to be controlled and temporized while treating other injuries. Typically, intravascular shunts are used for short time periods while orthopedic injuries are repaired or other life threatening injuries are managed. The following case demonstrates the long-term use of an intravascular arterial shunt to treat a traumatic transection of the common femoral artery and vein in a patient with an open pelvic fracture from blunt trauma. A 20-year-old woman fell between a subway platform and an oncoming train. She sustained a crush injury to her lower extremity and pelvis as she was pinned between the train and platform. The patient presented with active hemorrhage from a groin laceration, quickly became hemodynamically unstable, and was brought to the operating room. In addition to a pelvic fracture with massive pelvic hematoma she sustained a complete transection of the bifurcation of the common femoral artery (CFA), the common femoral vein (CFV), and associated orthopedic injuries. Vascular shunts were placed in the common femoral artery and vein. The patient became hypotensive from an expanding retroperitoneal hematoma. Pelvic bleeding was controlled with angioembolization and the venous injury was repaired. At this time the patient became cold, acidotic, and coagulopathic. It was thought unsafe to proceed with the arterial repair and it was elected to keep her arterial shunts in place and perform a planned reexploration in 24 hours after correcting her physiologic status. The patient returned to the operating room for an elective repair of her CFA the following day. Her shunt had remained patent throughout this time. She underwent a reverse saphenous vein graft from her CFA to her SFA. After a prolonged hospital course she was ultimately transferred to a rehabilitation center with intact pulses in both lower extremities. This case demonstrates the effectiveness of prolonged (>6 hours) use of an intravascular shunt as part of damage control surgery for peripheral arterial and venous injuries. In a patient who would otherwise undergo an amputation for their injury, the risk of shunt thrombosis, or infection, during damage control resuscitation may not be a contraindication for placement.
当周围血管损伤与危及生命的紧急情况同时出现时,控制周围血管出血可能是首要任务,然而,为了挽救生命而舍弃肢体是一条既定的原则。血管内分流术的应用使得在治疗其他损伤时能够控制并暂时处理动脉和静脉损伤。通常,血管内分流术用于短时间内,以便修复骨科损伤或处理其他危及生命的损伤。以下病例展示了血管内动脉分流术在一名因钝性创伤导致开放性骨盆骨折的患者中用于治疗股总动脉和静脉创伤性横断的长期应用。一名20岁女性掉入地铁站台与驶来的列车之间。她被夹在列车和站台之间时,下肢和骨盆受到挤压伤。患者腹股沟撕裂伤处有活动性出血,很快出现血流动力学不稳定,被送往手术室。除了骨盆骨折伴大量骨盆血肿外,她还遭受了股总动脉(CFA)分叉、股总静脉(CFV)完全横断以及相关的骨科损伤。在股总动脉和静脉中放置了血管分流器。患者因腹膜后血肿扩大而出现低血压。通过血管栓塞控制了骨盆出血,并修复了静脉损伤。此时,患者出现体温过低、酸中毒和凝血功能障碍。继续进行动脉修复被认为不安全,于是决定保留动脉分流器,并在纠正其生理状态24小时后进行计划性再次探查。次日,患者返回手术室进行CFA的择期修复。在此期间,她的分流器一直保持通畅。她接受了从CFA到股浅动脉(SFA)的大隐静脉逆向移植术。经过漫长的住院过程,她最终被转至康复中心,双下肢脉搏完好。该病例证明了作为周围动脉和静脉损伤损伤控制手术一部分的血管内分流术长时间(>6小时)使用的有效性。对于一名否则可能因伤接受截肢的患者,在损伤控制复苏期间分流器血栓形成或感染的风险可能并非放置分流器的禁忌证。