• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心力衰竭管理计划的长期影响有限。

Limited long term effects of a management programme for heart failure.

作者信息

Mejhert M, Kahan T, Persson H, Edner M

机构信息

Karolinska Institutet Danderyd Hospital, Section of Cardiology, S-182 88 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Heart. 2004 Sep;90(9):1010-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.014407.

DOI:10.1136/hrt.2003.014407
PMID:15310688
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1768467/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of a nurse based outpatient management programme for elderly patients discharged with heart failure from a university hospital.

DESIGN

Patients with heart failure (New York Heart Association class II-IV) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction aged 60 years or more were randomly assigned to follow up within the management programme or to conventional follow up, usually in primary care. Of the 208 participants, 58% were men, mean age was 75 years, and mean ejection fraction 34%. All patients were scheduled for three observational study visits at six month intervals. The primary end point was quality of life (QoL) and secondary end points were hospitalisation and mortality.

RESULTS

More patients achieved target doses of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in the intervention group than in the control group (82% v 69%, 88% v 69%, and 88% v 74% of recommended target doses at 6, 12, and 18 months of follow up, respectively, p < 0.05 for all). Patients with initial low QoL had a poor prognosis. After a mean 1122 days of follow up, 82% of all patients had been readmitted. There were on average 4.7 readmissions per patient and 66% were due to non-cardiac diagnoses. There were no differences in QoL or health care consumption between the two study groups during follow up.

CONCLUSION

A nurse based management programme is more effective than follow up in primary care in optimising medication for elderly patients with heart failure. However, such a programme does not seem to have a favourable influence on QoL or readmission rate during long term follow up.

摘要

目的

评估一项基于护士的门诊管理项目对从大学医院出院的老年心力衰竭患者的效果。

设计

年龄60岁及以上、患有心力衰竭(纽约心脏协会II-IV级)且左心室收缩功能障碍的患者被随机分配至管理项目组或常规随访组,常规随访通常在初级保健机构进行。208名参与者中,58%为男性,平均年龄75岁,平均射血分数为34%。所有患者均计划每隔6个月进行3次观察性研究访视。主要终点是生活质量(QoL),次要终点是住院率和死亡率。

结果

干预组中达到血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂目标剂量的患者比对照组更多(分别在随访6个月、12个月和18个月时,达到推荐目标剂量的比例为82%对69%、88%对69%和88%对74%,所有p值均<0.05)。初始生活质量较低的患者预后较差。经过平均1122天的随访,82%的患者再次入院。每位患者平均再次入院4.7次,66%是由于非心脏诊断。在随访期间,两个研究组在生活质量或医疗保健消耗方面没有差异。

结论

对于老年心力衰竭患者,基于护士的管理项目在优化药物治疗方面比初级保健随访更有效。然而,这样一个项目在长期随访期间似乎对生活质量或再入院率没有有利影响。

相似文献

1
Limited long term effects of a management programme for heart failure.心力衰竭管理计划的长期影响有限。
Heart. 2004 Sep;90(9):1010-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.014407.
2
Prevalence, clinical characteristics, quality of life, and prognosis of patients with congestive heart failure and isolated left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.充血性心力衰竭合并孤立性左心室舒张功能障碍患者的患病率、临床特征、生活质量及预后
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004 Mar;17(3):253-61. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2003.11.002.
3
A new programme of multidisciplinary care for patients with heart failure in Poznań: one-year follow-up.波兹南一项针对心力衰竭患者的多学科护理新计划:一年随访
Kardiol Pol. 2006 Oct;64(10):1063-70; discussion 1071-2.
4
Systolic versus diastolic heart failure in community practice: clinical features, outcomes, and the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.社区实践中收缩期与舒张期心力衰竭:临床特征、结局及血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的使用
Am J Med. 2000 Dec 1;109(8):605-13. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00601-x.
5
Cost/utility ratio in chronic heart failure: comparison between heart failure management program delivered by day-hospital and usual care.慢性心力衰竭的成本/效用比:日间医院提供的心力衰竭管理项目与常规护理的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Oct 2;40(7):1259-66. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02140-x.
6
Added value of a physician-and-nurse-directed heart failure clinic: results from the Deventer-Alkmaar heart failure study.由医生和护士主导的心力衰竭诊所的附加值:德文特-阿尔克马尔心力衰竭研究结果
Heart. 2007 Jul;93(7):819-25. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.095810. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
7
Improving outcomes in heart failure in the community: long-term survival benefit of a disease-management program.改善社区心力衰竭的治疗效果:疾病管理项目的长期生存益处。
Chest. 2005 Jun;127(6):2042-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.6.2042.
8
Cost effective management programme for heart failure reduces hospitalisation.心力衰竭的经济有效管理方案可减少住院率。
Heart. 1998 Nov;80(5):442-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.80.5.442.
9
Nurse-led titration of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-adrenergic blocking agents, and angiotensin receptor blockers for people with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.由护士主导对射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者进行血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、β肾上腺素能阻滞剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的滴定。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 21;2015(12):CD009889. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009889.pub2.
10
Biventricular pacing (cardiac resynchronization therapy): an evidence-based analysis.双心室起搏(心脏再同步治疗):基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(13):1-60. Epub 2005 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Specialised Heart Failure Outpatient Care on the Long-Term Application of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and on Prognosis in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.专科心力衰竭门诊护理对射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者指南指导药物治疗的长期应用及预后的影响
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jan 6;14(2):131. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14020131.
2
Efficacy of sustained knowledge translation (KT) interventions in chronic disease management in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of complex interventions.持续性知识转化(KT)干预措施在老年人慢性病管理中的效果:复杂干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2023 Jul 24;21(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02966-9.
3
Elements Characterising Multicomponent Interventions Used to Improve Disease Management Models and Clinical Pathways in Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: A Scoping Review.用于改善急慢性心力衰竭疾病管理模式和临床路径的多组分干预措施的特征:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 25;11(9):1227. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091227.
4
Multicomponent integrated care for patients with chronic heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis.多组分综合护理对慢性心力衰竭患者的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Apr;10(2):791-807. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14207. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
5
Home Telemonitoring and a Diagnostic Algorithm in the Management of Heart Failure in the Netherlands: Cost-effectiveness Analysis.荷兰心力衰竭管理中的家庭远程监测与诊断算法:成本效益分析
JMIR Cardio. 2022 Aug 4;6(2):e31302. doi: 10.2196/31302.
6
Managing patients with heart failure: contemporary real-world experience.心力衰竭患者管理:当代真实世界经验。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Feb 10;15(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-05938-z.
7
Impact of multi-disciplinary treatment strategy on systolic heart failure outcome.多学科治疗策略对收缩性心力衰竭预后的影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1214-0.
8
Valuing health-related quality of life in heart failure: a systematic review of methods to derive quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in trial-based cost-utility analyses.重视心力衰竭相关的生命质量:基于试验的成本效用分析中获得质量调整生命年(QALY)的方法的系统评价。
Heart Fail Rev. 2019 Jul;24(4):549-563. doi: 10.1007/s10741-019-09780-7.
9
Disease management interventions for heart failure.心力衰竭的疾病管理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 8;1(1):CD002752. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002752.pub4.
10
Effectiveness of implementation interventions in improving physician adherence to guideline recommendations in heart failure: a systematic review.实施干预措施在提高医生对心力衰竭指南建议的依从性方面的有效性:一项系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 6;8(3):e017765. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017765.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized, controlled trial of integrated heart failure management: The Auckland Heart Failure Management Study.心力衰竭综合管理的随机对照试验:奥克兰心力衰竭管理研究
Eur Heart J. 2002 Jan;23(2):139-46. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2712.
2
Randomized trial of an education and support intervention to prevent readmission of patients with heart failure.一项预防心力衰竭患者再次入院的教育与支持干预的随机试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Jan 2;39(1):83-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01699-0.
3
Randomised controlled trial of specialist nurse intervention in heart failure.专科护士干预心力衰竭的随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2001 Sep 29;323(7315):715-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7315.715.
4
Risk factors in established coronary heart disease: evaluation of a secondary prevention programme.
J Cardiovasc Risk. 2001 Apr;8(2):73-80. doi: 10.1177/174182670100800203.
5
A systematic review of randomized trials of disease management programs in heart failure.心力衰竭疾病管理项目随机试验的系统评价
Am J Med. 2001 Apr 1;110(5):378-84. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00743-9.
6
Toleration of high doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with chronic heart failure: results from the ATLAS trial. The Assessment of Treatment with Lisinopril and Survival.慢性心力衰竭患者对高剂量血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的耐受性:ATLAS试验结果。赖诺普利治疗与生存评估。
Arch Intern Med. 2001 Jan 22;161(2):165-71. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.2.165.
7
Nurse-led heart failure clinics in Sweden.瑞典由护士主导的心力衰竭诊所。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2001 Jan;3(1):139-44. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(00)00099-4.
8
Epidemiology of heart failure in Sweden--a national survey.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2001 Jan;3(1):97-103. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(00)00115-x.
9
Trends in hospitalization for heart failure in Scotland, 1990-1996. An epidemic that has reached its peak?1990 - 1996年苏格兰心力衰竭住院情况趋势。一场已达顶峰的流行病?
Eur Heart J. 2001 Feb;22(3):209-17. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2291.
10
Diagnostic tests, treatment and follow-up in heart failure patients--is there a gender bias in the coherence to guidelines?
Eur J Heart Fail. 1999 Dec;1(4):407-10. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(99)00053-7.