Heo J, Kegel J, Iskandrian A S, Cave V, Iskandrian B B
Philadelphia Heart Institute, Presbyterian Medical Center of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
J Nucl Med. 1992 Feb;33(2):186-91.
Two same-day protocols (rest/exercise [Protocol 1] and exercise/rest [Protocol 2]) with sestamibi (hexakis 2-methoxy-2-isobutyl-isonitrile) were performed within 2 to 14 days of each other after randomization. The initial study in each protocol was done using a dose of 185-296 MBq of 99mTc-sestamibi. The second study in each protocol used a dose of 555-925 MBq. SPECT imaging was started 30 to 60 min after injection using a 180 degrees anterior arc. Segmental analysis was interpreted as normal, scar or ischemia (20 segments/patient). Among the protocols, there was concordance in 93% of the segments (593/640 segments). In the 11 patients with coronary artery disease and no prior myocardial infarction who had ischemic abnormality, count densities from abnormal and normal zones were compared between the two protocols. Protocol 1 showed greater count differences between abnormal and normal zones on exercise images with better normalization of abnormality on rest images than Protocol 2 (p less than 0.05). Technetium-99m-sestamibi provides high quality images using either of the two same-day protocols. However, the rest/exercise protocol provides better image contrast and ability to detect reversibility of perfusion defects, and is the preferred same-day protocol.
在随机分组后,于彼此间隔2至14天内进行了两种同日方案(静息/运动[方案1]和运动/静息[方案2])的锝-99m甲氧基异丁基异腈(sestamibi)检查。每个方案的首次研究使用185 - 296MBq的99mTc - sestamibi剂量。每个方案的第二次研究使用555 - 925MBq的剂量。注射后30至60分钟开始使用180度前弧形进行单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)成像。节段性分析被解读为正常、瘢痕或缺血(每位患者20个节段)。在各方案之间,93%的节段(593/640个节段)结果一致。在11例患有冠状动脉疾病且无既往心肌梗死且存在缺血异常的患者中,比较了两种方案之间异常区域和正常区域的计数密度。与方案2相比,方案1在运动图像上异常区域与正常区域之间的计数差异更大,且静息图像上的异常情况有更好的归一化表现(p小于0.05)。锝-99m甲氧基异丁基异腈使用两种同日方案中的任何一种都能提供高质量图像。然而,静息/运动方案提供了更好的图像对比度和检测灌注缺损可逆性的能力,是首选的同日方案。